User talk:Js229
Epirubicin
[edit]Thank you for your additions to Epirubicin. Most pharm articles are in dire need of historical information; have you considered joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology? Best wishes, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 13:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Bowdon Rooms
[edit]I deleted your contribution because the Bowdon Rooms don't appear to be notable, not listed, just advertised widely as a wedding venue. Your list of references had four "references" from Wikipedia that don't mention the venue and an advert. Wikipedia cannot be used to reference an article and the other is advertising, please don't add it again to this article or any other. J3Mrs (talk) 07:05, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
For reference, it wasn't 'my' contribution. I thought you may not have been right in assuming advertising as the motive of the original contribution and reverted your deletion on the grounds of spam. The case for notability that you now raise is weak, I agree, and I don't intend to get into an edit war over. I don't think it can be reasonable though to ask me not to add 'it' to any article ever again; there are a number of contexts (the history of the building and interior images) for which the company website might be a useful and legitimate factual source. Js229 (talk) 08:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
A page you started (Frederick Bernheim) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Frederick Bernheim.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Looks good-I'm always keen to see more biochemistry content! I've added a few more citations from Google Books. A few things have been added (by me and some other editors) that are standard, good things to have for an article on a scientist: categories, an "authority control" tag (linking to his work on library catalogues), a "default sort" tag (so in categories he appears under 'B' for Bernheim, not 'F'). Some of your citations have also been polished a bit: you can just paste a DOI or PMID number into the citation box and the computer will fill out the citation for you, often with no further adjustment needed. Hope that's all OK!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Blythwood}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Blythwood (talk) 22:30, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Max Hirmer) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Max Hirmer.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
I've added a slight reorganisation–I've put in a standard references section that goes above the external links, and fixed a citation that wasn't properly filled out. I've also added a category for German botanists.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Blythwood}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Blythwood (talk) 22:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Emily Hale
[edit]
On 20 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Emily Hale, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that T. S. Eliot defended himself from the grave after 1,131 of his letters to Emily Hale (pictured) were released in January 2020, stating that he "never at any time had sexual relations" with her? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Emily Hale. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Emily Hale), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Walter Porstmann
[edit]
Hello, Js229. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Walter Porstmann, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Walter Porstmann
[edit]
Hello, Js229. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Walter Porstmann".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:52, 4 June 2023 (UTC)