User talk:Jrphayes/Archive Jan 2008

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Jrphayes. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Vandalism

Please do, I chose the wrong warning. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 17:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Reverted your edit

Fair enough, I hadn't found that page, thanks for the up! // F 9 T 14:36, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

London Meetup - January 12, 2008

Hi! There's going to be a London Wikipedia Meetup coming Saturday January 12, 2008. If you are interested in coming along take part in the discussion over at Wikipedia:Meetup/London7. The discussion is going on until tomorrow evening and the official location and time will be published at the same page late Thursday or early Friday. Hope to see you Saturday, Poeloq (talk) 02:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Fernando Torres

Hey, about a month ago (sorry I'm only saying this now, I haven't logged on) you left a vandalism on my talk page, saying that I vandalized the Fernando Torres article. At first I thought I never made any edits to that site anyway, but when I checked the history of that article I found that I had. I never vandalized it, though; all I did was revert it from the previous edit which in itself was vandalism. Check it yourself, the edit before mine was complete vandalism and I just reverted it, so why did you leave a note of a vandalism on my page? Xioyux (talk) 16:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, Jrphayes! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 20:06, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Martin Škrtel

Hi! I want to discuss your recent edit to Martin Škrtel. You removed parts of text from the article on the basis that information is in infobox too. This is not, however, a valid reason for removal since the role of infobox is to dublicate most important information from the text. You can read purpose section at Template:Infobox Football biography and discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Role of infobox. Would you be so kind to revert your removal? Jhony | Talk 18:27, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

I have an impression that I offended you, so I do apologise. We are two who are interested in improving Martin Škrtel, so maybe the best place to discuss expansions and deletions is our talk pages or, preferably, Talk:Martin Škrtel. In this particular case: who cares about the section, just bring sentences back. :) It was not a libel, so I can't see how presence of this sentences will make article worse. And yes, surely any section of the article is unfinished stuff, but "deleting of "unfinished" stuff can often greatly hinder the eventual creation of "finished" stuff" (c)(source) :) Jhony | Talk 21:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh, you've already done it. Anyway, I want to hear your thoughts. Jhony | Talk 21:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)