User talk:Jrooksjr

Welcome!

Hello Jrooksjr, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Steven Walling • talk 17:17, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Poland

You have written Kashubian language|Sorbian, it's not true.Xx236 (talk) 10:38, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Link to changes made. (talk) 13:54, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You have replaced "Kashubian" by "Sorbian".Xx236 (talk) 14:18, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Languages of Poland misinforms, eg. Lithuanian is a regional languge.Xx236 (talk) 07:19, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR

Please do not engage in edit warring. Your edits of the List of Unicode characters page are disruptive. You have been invited to discuss the issue here on the talk page. - thewolfchild 17:06, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that per WP:SP, Wikipedia explicitly disallows subpages from being created in articlespace for any reason; every page in articlespace has to stand alone as a complete functioning article in its own right. Pages of the type you created as subpage spinoffs from List of Unicode characters, rather, must be created in templatespace only; accordingly, they've been moved to {{List of Unicode characters/1}}, {{List of Unicode characters/2}}, {{List of Unicode characters/3}} and {{List of Unicode characters/4}}. Bearcat (talk) 03:31, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding bureaucrat link on userpage

Heya Jrooksjr, this is just a suggestion so feel free to disregard it if you want but I see you link Wikipedia:Bureaucrat on your userpage for you being a 'crat on the Ikariam wikia. This might confuse some folks around here who might not use wikia or know how it operates, etc. I too use(d) wikia to get a start so I know how it goes Anywho, it might not be a bad idea to replace that link with a link to wikia:ikariam:Help:User access levels#Bureaucrats or wikia:ikariam:Ikariam:Bureaucrats since they would better detail your role/userrights on the Ikariam wikia. Cheers, — -dainomite 05:46, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

done -- (M o r p h | ^C | _T) 12:11, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Montgomery County Transportation Program

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Montgomery County Transportation Program, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://sh242dc.com/index.php?page=mctp.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:28, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:U.S. Route 69.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:U.S. Route 69.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:U.S. Route 69.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:U.S. Route 69.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:31, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:GP Segment Overview 20121212.pdf

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GP Segment Overview 20121212.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:28, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:U.S. Route 69.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:U.S. Route 69.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:09, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of state highways in Polk County, Texas (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Imzadi1979 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of state highways in Polk County, Texas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Imzadi 1979 → 16:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More specifically, there's a question of notability for grouping the state highways at the county level in such detail. Each article on a county can easily list the highways within that county without all of the detail. As I explained in my comments when I decline the article through AfC, these lists were a fad from a few years ago. To make a featured topic on the "State Highways in Marquette County, Michigan", we'd need List of state highways in Marquette County, Michigan to serve as the lead article. Well, the FT on that subject was demoted years ago, and no other FTs have been attempted in several years. The need for the lists of highways by county just doesn't exist anymore, and we should be discouraging the further creation of any more, and possibly merging away the existing examples into sections of the county articles. Imzadi 1979 → 17:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Outside of

Hi

I beg to differ about your reversion of my removal of the word "of" from "outside of". Both "outside" and "of" are prepositions which, by the definition of a "pre position" are used to precede nouns. In the spatial sense, such as used in this article, the noun follows "outside" and the word "of" is at least redundant but also, I would argue, wrong. There is an accepted use of the compound preposition "outside of" but this is only used when the phrase has the equivalent meaning to "apart from" or similar. The two uses have become widely conflated, but are distinctly different.

Wikipedia appears to have accepted as convention the position I have taken, as evidence by the numerous categories and articles which include the words "outside of" which are redirected to an equivalent without the word "of". By way of example, have a look at this link: List of United States Senators born outside of the United States. There are many other such redirects.

Paul

MfD nomination of Draft:List of state highways in Polk County, Texas

Draft:List of state highways in Polk County, Texas, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:List of state highways in Polk County, Texas and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:List of state highways in Polk County, Texas during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 21:32, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:List of Unicode characters/1

Template:List of Unicode characters/1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 13:45, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Liberty County Toll Road Authority for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liberty County Toll Road Authority is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liberty County Toll Road Authority until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 03:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Desktop improvements prototype

Hello, Jrooksjr!

Thanks for taking the time to participate in the user feedback round for our desktop improvements prototype. This feedback is super valuable to us and is currently being used to determine our next steps. We have published a report gathering the main takeaways from the feedback and highlighting the changes we’ll make based on this feedback. Please take a look and give us your thoughts on the talk page of the report. To learn more about the project overall and the other features we’re planning on building in the future, check out the main project page.

SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 12:51, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Untitled Star Trek television series" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Untitled Star Trek television series. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 24#Untitled Star Trek television series until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Wikipedical (talk) 23:12, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Webb County–City of Laredo Regional Mobility Authority

The article Webb County–City of Laredo Regional Mobility Authority has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

County-level government agency, no evidence of notability per WP: ORGCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]