User talk:Jrneumann

Thanks for uploading Image:PowerSystemsCAD-1.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Jneumann-2007-1.jpg. The copy called Image:Jneumann-2007-1.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 21:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of EDSA Micro Corporation

I've nominated EDSA Micro Corporation, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that EDSA Micro Corporation satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EDSA Micro Corporation and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of EDSA Micro Corporation during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

AfD nomination of Power Analytics

I've nominated Power Analytics, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Power Analytics satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power Analytics and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Power Analytics during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

Respose to AfD nomination of Power Analytics

Thanks for inviting the discussion. Please take a look at the technical article at the bottom of the Power Analytics page. It describes why government, energy producers, and corporations all feel that this is a crucial technology in protecting against outages like the Northeast Blackout of 2003 and preserving the environmental-friendliness of massive energy-consuming facilities. Important stuff; please take a look and let me know what you think. JrneumannJrneumann 16:22, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do NOT repost deleted articles without first going through the appropriate review process. Rklawton (talk) 17:51, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Power Systems Engineering

A tag has been placed on Power Systems Engineering, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Exxolon 21:39, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Power Systems CAD

Power Systems CAD, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Power Systems CAD satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power Systems CAD and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Power Systems CAD during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 18:00, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Cpclogo.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Cpclogo.JPG. The copy called Image:Cpclogo.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 00:00, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:AliNasle.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:AliNasle.JPG. The copy called Image:AliNasle.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 17:00, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Nasle

Your article about Ali Nasle has many statements which purport to assert his notability, but have no source citations to let editors verify those claims. The links you provided are simply generic links to the home pages of various organizations, and are therefore not valid. Please provide specific links to material that verifies Mr. Nasle's status. If you cannot, your article will likely be deleted due to lack of verification. Please let me know if you need help. Realkyhick 17:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note; this was a WIP, and knowlingly incomplete. Third-party verification of awards added where possible; some date back into the 1970s and 1980s, pre-WWW, so further verification is difficult fir organizations with historical records on the site. Thanks for the offer of help; I think we're covered.Jrneumann 21:13, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Jneumann[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cpclogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cpclogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:04, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Notability of James Belasco

A tag has been placed on James Belasco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bearian 18:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was nominated for speedy deletion by another editor, and I deleted it. Not because of any personal opinions, but due to Wikipedia policies and guidelines. See WP:BIO: it lacked sufficient sources saying why he was notable. нмŵוτн τ 22:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:PowerSystemsCAD-1.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PowerSystemsCAD-1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 23:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Power Analytics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Power Analytics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power Analytics (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. shoy (reactions) 21:37, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:AliNasle.jpg

The file File:AliNasle.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]