User talk:Jrmski

Citizens' Voice

I noticed the misspelled version of the Citizens' Voice page about the same time as you did. I made the wrong one into a re-direct. — Michael J 16:57, 15 September 2006 (UTC) (A King's alumnus!)[reply]

Lake-Lehman

On a similar note, shouldn't the page on Lake-Lehman High School correctly have a hyphen in its name? — Michael J 16:58, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, as per your suggestion. Jrmski 19:51, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I just wanted to thank you for the contributions to the Wilkes University article. I'm a Wilkes Alum. ('02 in CS). It's good to see the pictures and see what the University has been up to recently. Cadre 04:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Larry Page Article Vandalism

Hello. I've been watching the Larry Page article over a few months. The "jewish" references have been bouncing in and out nearly every day lately, and at least 2-3 times each week over that entire period. At one point someone had a not-very-authoritative reference, but otherwise they have typically been unreferenced. Anyhow, can we safely assume that this is vandalism, or might some people be adding this with good intentions? I'm wondering if you might be willing to help me research this, and set a solid answer, or do something to curtail this. Any ideas? Jrmski 23:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jrmski, the key point is when you use the word "intentions" above. Some people would like to add this material out of ethnic pride. Some people would like to add this material to prove some anti-semetic theory. Whatever the case, only SOURCED, RELIABLE, RELEVANT material should be added to improve the article and NOT based on anybodies intentions. People from BOTH sides dislike the edits I make so I know I am doing good work :). Bottom line, ANY material that is added to this project should have a reliable source provided AND be relevant to the article. Is this easy? Big no. Thanks for your comment and best of luck with your editing experiences here. Cheers! --Tom 14:17, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Donkey basketball.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Donkey basketball.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Jrmski}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:The Times Leader Font Page.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Times Leader Font Page.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:35, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rt50 termini md ca sign.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rt50 termini md ca sign.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:49, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]