User talk:Jrcraft Yt

This is Jrcraft Yt's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Disruptive Editor Active Again

Yourwelcome for the edit! Also the previously banned user has returned using a new IP and made a bunch of changes. I'm not sure if they are actually correct or just more disruptive editing but that's for your info. Also I figured out how to revert edits thanks to Ferret. You go to Preferences>Gadgets>Twinkle. Would be useful against him since he makes multiple changes in a row.--Killamin7 (talk) 13:28, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When you leave warnings

Just as a note, when you warn a user you generally should go up in severity each time - there is no need to have two second level warnings, as you did here. Also, that user only made one edit on List of Presidential Medal of Freedom recipients, and I left them a warning already - one warning per bad edit is all that's needed. (Also have you enabled Twinkle? You can do that in your preferences - it's what I use to revert vandalism and it lets you leave custom warnings as well as revert multiple edits at the same time. You might find it helpful!) Lcodyh803 (talk) 03:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lcodyh803 (talk) I Will try that tool out, thank you! --Jrcraft Yt (talk) 03:54, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Rocketry Invitation

Thank you for your recent contributions to super-heavy lift launch vehicle. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Rocketry? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's rocketry-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. Please see our list of open tasks for ideas on where to get started.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 14:57, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:S-I has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:S-I. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: S-I has been accepted

S-I, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:56, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Saturn I into S-I. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 11:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Covid Vaccine Map

The new map on the covid vaccine page seems to be wrong? The EU is under planned section when mass vaccination is underway? There was a map yesterday with all the correct information. Do you know how to fix it? Ire96 (talk) 18:18, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ire96: Right, it was a revert. The one I reverted (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=COVID-19_vaccine&oldid=996767273#/media/File:COVID-19_vaccine_map-7.svg) was broken. Look at the right side.

List of presidents of the United States

Hello. Will you please stop adding in 'acting presidents' at List of presidents of the United States. They're not US president, but only US vice presidents performing presidential powers & duties. GoodDay (talk) 18:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 in spaceflight (January–June), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DLR. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for LauncherOne

On 21 January 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article LauncherOne, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 01:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question

When you commented here, did you get N828335's ping before you commented? (or right after). For some reason I didn't both times - trying to figure out if there's an issue on my end. Thanks. OkayKenji ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:01, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@OkayKenji: I didn't either. I was sort of confused by that.

I replied to your comment on my talk-page. El Roih

See title. El Roih (talk) 14:06, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Attention: Dispute Resolution Request

There has been a dispute on the article List of Starship flights. A dispute resolution request has been sent to Wikipedia. 64.121.103.144 (talk) 19:38, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note from the maker of the dispute resolution request

SpaceX said SN10's landing was a soft landing, not a hard one. And remember that SN8, SN9, and Sn11 exploded either at landing or soon before it. Can you tell me your response on my talk page (below)? 64.121.103.144 (talk) 15:35, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Rocketry

WikiProject Rocketry ended earlier this month. I revived it on 17 April 2021. You are welcome to help with it. It is currently considered semi-active. If edits continue often, please replace it with active. You are also invited to edit Draft: Wikipedia:WikiProject SpaceX (company) and add your username to the members list. 64.121.103.144 (talk) 20:31, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DLR.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-paste moves

Hi, Jrcraft Yt. I saw that you copied the content from VSS Unity Unity21 to Virgin Galactic Unity 21. There are two issues with this: First, as a copy-paste move, it violates the attribution requirements of the CC-BY-SA license. I see that Diannaa left you a note about something similar in October. It's very important that you understand the rules about copying within Wikipedia, so if you have any questions, please let me know.

Second, you made this move without clearly explaining why the page should use the new title. Even if you had moved this the correct way (see Help:Move), you would need to leave a clear summary, so other editors know why you're doing what you're doing.

For now, I've reversed the redirect. The article is back where it used to be, and the other page redirects to it. If you can explain the reasoning for the move to me, I'll let you know whether it can be done unilaterally (in which case there's a few technical things we'll need to deal with, due to the copy-paste move) or whether it should go to Wikipedia:Requested moves.

Thanks, and again, please let me know if you have any questions. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 05:10, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Their naming scheme was uncertain as they had referred to their previous flight by Unity21, Unity 21 and VF-03 without specifically calling out a specific one. With the recent July 11th flight announcement, it's being referred to simply as Unity 22. That's why I moved it to Virgin Galactic Unity 21 because that fit in line with their naming scheme and follows the same style as other crewed spaceflight launches on Wikipedia. --Jrcraft Yt (talk) 13:21, 2 July 2021 (UTC) @Tamzin:[reply]

That seems like original research, though? "Virgin Galactic Unity 21" gets 3 hits on Google: the page you created and two that are referencing it. Conformity is important in article titles, but we still generally want to use names that are actually in use elsewhere (WP:COMMONNAME). Perhaps you should discuss this on a relevant WikiProject, or file a requested move? -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 00:23, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not. Virgin Galactic use both terms "Unity 21" and Unity21" for different reasons. Unity21 and Unity22 are both used in their social media hashtags (#Unity21 and #Unity22) where the spaces are used in press releases and what have you. At least changing the page to "Virgin Galactic Unity21" would put it in line with Wikipedia's style guide. Those guidelines are meant to establish a baseline acrossed Wikipedia for crewed Spaceflights. For example, SpaceX's Crew-1 mission page is called "SpaceX Crew-1" and Boeing's OFT page is "Boeing Orbital Test Flight" following the format of "(Company) (Mission name)." That is why Unity 22's page is "Virgin Galactic Unity 22." It establishes a baseline within the styling guidelines and matches other spaceflight articles. If you would rather it be "Virgin galactic Unity21," That's ok, but it will be out of place with the other ones. @Tamzin: --Jrcraft Yt (talk) 03:29, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indenting

Hello! I'm ProcrastinatingReader. Please remember to indent your posts on talk pages, as you did not on Talk:Richard Branson. This allows for concise communication and clear understanding between editors during discussions. Thank you and happy editing! ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:46, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of spaceflight launches in July–December 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PLA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell the final serial no.

Jrcraft Yt, Please tell the answer of the question asked by me at the last in this article. The launch is nearing Chinakpradhan (talk) 16:17, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jrcraft Yt, does you use Twitter if it is so then please confirm exactly with Anatoly, the Russian production no. What I did on that page may be called a hypothetical research and removed Chinakpradhan (talk) 17:47, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It may become also happen that he may get summoned of the issue and publish it on his own prichal page by your question Chinakpradhan (talk) 17:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish please ask him to even confirm the missing no. In submarine of Progress m that is 55, 60 or 70 as it will also get sourced then. I will also be happy even if you tell if any wikipedian is with Twitter so he can ask him in case you don't use Twitter Chinakpradhan (talk) 17:58, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop calling using Celestrak/T. S. Kelso as "original research"

You've done this a couple times now. Celestrak and it's owner T. S. Kelso are extremely accurate sources on satellite information. The site is the unofficial source for reading all US government radar tracking of satellites. Ergzay (talk) 16:35, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The source itself is fine. They wat in which you are interpreting the data shoes a critical misunderstanding of the situational context and is therefore not a correct nor reliable source in this context. You said it yourself, it's unofficial. --Jrcraft Yt (talk) 17:33, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jrcraft Yt. Thank you for your work on Transatmospheric orbit. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:54, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SpaceX Starship "Partial Failure" Edit War

Hi, just pinging you as that same user is attempting to ram through their point of view with no discussion, to the point of reverting anyone who changes the classification to "failure" and saying the discussion has been "abandoned" because you have not posted in 24 hours. I don't want to start an edit war, so I'm letting them have their way for now (they have reverted me twice) but I would really appreciate your assistance in actually allowing the discussion to continue – Jadebenn (talk · contribs · subpages) 00:02, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jrcraft Yt (talk) 00:31, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I also wanted to let you know that User:Fyunck(click) has filed an edit warring report against me on WP:AN/3RR. DASL51984 ^{(Speak to me!)} 22:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

regarding starship IFT-2, in any other orbital rocket launch, achieving an orbital trajectory but insufficient velocity or altitude is considered a "partial success", but since this was intentionally suborbital from the start it's not clear what the criteria should be. do we even know the targeted velocity?

please link to the supposed "consensus" that was achieved "after months of discussion" on the IFT-2 talk page. also, since this was a different flight with different goals and a different outcome, you'll have to make an argument why the "consensus" that so many editors apparently disagree with is both relevant and actually a consensus. it will be less work than reverting hundreds of edits... 135.180.103.131 (talk) 09:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

There is currently a discussion at Talk:SpaceX Starship regarding a note that a user is repeatedly trying to insert into the "failures" section. The thread is RfC on "clarifying failure in infobox". Thank you. DASL51984 ^{(Speak to me!)} 19:19, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

I've just written Redacted II up again at WP:ANI after what just happened on the SpaceX Starship talk page. They're getting all defensive but I'm not backing down since it's gotten way out of hand. DASL51984 ^{(Speak to me!)} 14:24, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, it's appreciated. I won;t let them do this stuff again. Jrcraft Yt (talk) 05:57, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of missions to the moon

You are wrong, a spacecraft does not perform a flyby when entering lunar orbit?? A flyby includes flying past the moon, your point makes no sense. 109.78.71.72 (talk) 07:30, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of VSS Imagine

The article VSS Imagine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

VSS Imagine is no longer planned to fly (https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/13/investing-in-space-virgin-galactic-enters-spaceflight-hiatus.html). I don't think an unflown ground test article that was "leapfrogged" is notable enough for an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ultimograph5 (talk) 18:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy

You know who I am, I know where you live RunsWithScssors (talk) 07:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]