User talk:Jpvicas

This is my talk page.

Spectrum 1: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Spectrum 1: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 16:37, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but I don't understand how this works. I'm trying to write an article about a series of books published annually called Spectrum: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic art. In Sandbox, I have the main page of the article describing how the series was created and notable information. On that page I also have the list of volumes (Vol. 1, 2, 3, etc) which will be links to each individual Wikipedia page for each volume after I've created them. I thought I would be creating sub-pages of the main article. In Sandbox, I created the first volume page, which you have moved to Draftspace.

I thought if I create pages in Sandbox, they remain saved, but not published until I'm finished and submit the entire article for review. Because each sub-page is a simple description of each volume, do they need citations as well? Thank you for your time and attention.

You created the page in main space, not the sandbox. Pages in the main space need reliable sources, and they also need to show that the subject is notable: see WP:NOTABILITY and WP:NBOOK for guidance. I moved it to the draft space so that you can continue to work on it without it being deleted. ... discospinster _talk 17:19, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please delete this page? I have a better idea for how to present the information on individual volumes and won't need this page anymore. Thank You very much.

Your thread has been archived

Hi Jpvicas! You created a thread called Fair Use Images at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Spectrum: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art, from its old location at User:Jpvicas/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 19:42, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spectrum: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jovanmilic97 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

In the current state, it doesn't meet WP:NBOOK. Also, please remove references to other Wikipedia articles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spectrum: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Spectrum: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jpvicas! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Spectrum 1: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Spectrum 1: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:42, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Spectrum 1: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art

Hello, Jpvicas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Spectrum 1: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:28, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Spectrum: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Spectrum: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spectrum: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The format on this page also needs to be overhauled. See WP:MOS

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spectrum: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Spectrum: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 17:04, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spectrum: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement in organizing the information since last time. If this is a book series, this should be organized with a simpler volume list that doesn't have every last detail. The awards lists are not necessary, since they give them with each volume. If this is more like a periodical like IEEE Spectrum, then it should be reformatted as such.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spectrum: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Spectrum: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:44, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Spectrum 1: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Spectrum 1: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:24, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Spectrum 1: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art

Hello, Jpvicas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Spectrum 1: The Best In Contemporary Fantastic Art".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:38, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]