User talk:Jprather18

Blog 1 Notes: Environmental Protection: • Yes • Yes. No distractions. • Yes, even when discussing politics that have to do with environmental protection the claims remained neutral • Most of the citations come from governmental articles around the world. These sources are neutral on the issue, mainly just presenting the data obtained. • The links worked and there was no plagiarism • Soon the US will be if Trump disbands the EPA. The government section does not include all of the world and some of the sections have scarce information Engineering: • Yes • Yes. No distractions. • Yes, when discussing methodology, the info given is very neutral, mainly stating facts with citations, no bias on different types of methodology • Most of the citations come from educational textbooks or encyclopedias and government articles. These sources exhibit neutrality among topics. • Good links and no plagiarism • All up to date Pollution: • Yes • Yes. No distractions. • Yes, everything is generally backed up by fact with no clear bias • Most citations are from governmental organizations, encyclopedias, and academic articles. All with neutral arguments • Good links and no plagiarism • Mostly up to date, some data is about a decade old

Article review

Hi classmate, I review the proposed change you wrote about the article Droughts in California in your sandbox. I think the improvement you think of is very necessary. I agree that the lead is too short. So are many subsections that really need more information. Since you the stuffs you proposed you improve contain a large information, have you thought about looked for more references? Can't wait to see the article after your improvement.

Best, Qing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilyyeqing (talk • contribs) 15:27, 24 April 2017 (UTC)