User talk:Jpp42

Jpp42

I am a wikipedia user. Jpp42 05:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Jpp42, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

--

The indentation of your original comment in Talk:Johnstown Flood was fine. Your "fix" actually broke the indentation. By convention, each subsequent comment should be indented one more level. If the indentation gets too far to the right, then you can reset the indentation back to the left margin and start over again. I simply reverted your last edit to restore the original indentation.

Thanks for your contributions, and welcome to Wikipedia! -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) ^(Talk) 12:40, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, since my comment wasn't in reply to the previous reply, but rather in reply to the original comment, it didn't need to be indented again. But it's not that big a deal :-) Jpp42 09:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chromhidrosis article

Hi, you left a message on my talk page regarding the Chromhidrosis article. The first version of the article that I wrote was not a copyright violation, I wrote that myself. The current version however is indeed a straight copy from emedicine. --WS 16:58, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Movember

Hey, you posted on the talk page of Movember that you saw a report indicating that Movember.com donated a very small amount to charity. Do you remember the source of this report? Thanks in advance! The.orpheus (talk) 21:33, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, as I said on Talk:Movember, this was from another person (a colleague) who didn't remember the original source, but we think it was Today Tonight. I see that financial reports are available, and given that the movember.com charity is supported by some fairly respectable corporations, I am not overly concerned about this rumour. And of course Today Tonight is hardly the most reliable source. Jpp42 (talk) 01:21, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great_circle article

Hi, you undid a change I made to the Great_circle article. You stated that "*easterly* tracks use the jetstream" -- but I respectfully disagree, although I do acknowledge that the accompanying diagram *is* correct.

I believe the confusion is in the definition of the word *easterly*. My [British] understanding of the word is "from the east" but having checked various definitions at [1] it seems to variously (and confusingly) mean both "toward the east" and "from the east".

May I suggest changing the wording to something like "tracks towards the east use the jetstream" to avoid confusion?

Pthompson (talk) 13:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

I have deleted your edits to the D. B. Cooper article, as they only repeated material that was already mentioned in the preceding paragraphs. David J Johnson (talk) 23:42, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Um, you missed the point of those edits. I changed "pilot" to "captain" because you are repeating an oft mistaken myth that only the captain (i.e. the pilot in charge) of an airline is "the pilot." There were TWO pilots on this plane, not one - calling the captain simply "the pilot" without clarification is giving the first officer/co-pilot a demotion which he certainly doesn't deserve. Jpp42 (talk) 12:22, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jpp42. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jpp42. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]