User talk:Jpacarter

Welcome!

Hello, Jpacarter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —Tetracube (talk) 21:22, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Harrythe CCLRcat.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Harrythe CCLRcat.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 16:39, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Citation

That's an excellent start on proving the notability of the railroad cat. However, a proper reference would help. "as featured the 15" railways book" is not really enough. Do you have a author, publisher, year, etc? Neutron Jack (talk) 05:53, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And, of course, an ISBN and a page number - is it a Cleethorpes Coast Light Railway or unreliable non-notable vanity publication ? If multiple reliable 'proper reference[s]' can be found for Harry's importance, then an article can be tried for the beast anyway, and, following this, moggy can be added back. Acabashi (talk) 19:40, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jpacarter, I have responded to your comment on my talk page, on my talk page. Acabashi (talk) 21:03, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can't really call Harry a beast as he's neither large or dangerous, he is a pussycat. The worst he could do is to give you a nasty stare. See my reply on your page.