User talk:Joymgb

Welcome!

Hello, Joymgb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ... Hi, I saw mention of your article Vinos Sofka and edited there just a bit. I am inserting this "Welcome" message before other messages you have already received. --do ncr am 03:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

While Vinos Sofka is very probably notable enough to be the subject of a Wikipedia article, the article you created was not the right one, as it was unambiguously written to promote a point of view. The article was full of praise for Vinos Sofka, clearly showing that the writer of the article believes he was a great person, and it also clearly sought to encourage the reader to agree with the views which the article attributed to Vinos Sofka. A Wikipedia article, however, should be written from a neutral point of view, and writing which promotes, advertises, or advocates a particular view is contrary to Wikipedia policy. The promotional nature of the article would justify summarily deleting it, in acordance with Wikipedia's policy on speedy deletion, but you have clearly put a good deal of work into it, so instead of deleting it I have moved it to Draft:Vinos Sofka, where it can be worked on and improved, and eventually submitted for review by an experienced editor who will check whether it is suitable as an article, and if not give advice on what improvements are needed. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 22:23, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vinos Sofka has been accepted

Vinos Sofka, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 06:28, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joymgb, I thought you should have an update. The article was still very promotional, but a number of us have worked on it and it's now shorter and more neutral. I was able to track down one of the references that you didn't have a url for, and add another, but I was unable to find anything in the Swedish newspapers; it's possible it's not online, or that since he returned to the Czech Republic for the latter part of his career, he didn't get a Swedish obituary. I was concerned to find some inaccuracies, and I tried to add a little bit about his personal life; do you have a reference about his wife, and whether he remarried? But please don't add back any of the praise for his work, or a list of publications; since this is an encyclopedia, we keep entries brief and factual, and based on the most reliable sources. (Additional sources independent of ICOM and ICOFOM would be good.) THanks for writing about him! Yngvadottir (talk) 12:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]