User talk:Joujyuze

Welcome

Hello, Joujyuze, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 16:05, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

May 2021

Hi, I want you, if possible and having the will, to analyze the edits by user FMSky which are considered to be potentially unfair and unconstructive; this refers on edits by account user: 89.164.199.18 and 141.136.245.131, reverted by former. The edits are most of them generally well made but with some mistakes by account user; FMSky's edits are not so much well constructed and so should be reverted whole or partial; the topic is about video game titles only, sections Gameplay, Development, sometimes Reception (not all titles if necessary) etc.; the user's goal was to make fair gramatic corrections, for example: Duplicate words (and numbers), colons, commas, grammatic shortenings in order to make titles smooth and accessible (in short not so much complicated) etc. If you are not interested, than farewell. Peace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.138.48.219 (talk) 22:53, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, how I do so? I found his user page, but nothing about his contributions. Joujyuze (talk) 07:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Honey locust have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Honey locust was changed by Joujyuze (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876355 on 2021-02-23T10:30:27+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 14:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Neo-feudalism have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Neo-feudalism was changed by Joujyuze (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95616 on 2021-05-15T19:23:52+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:23, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Refeudalization. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Refeudalization was changed by Joujyuze (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.887748 on 2021-05-15T19:33:23+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:33, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Free speech zone, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Free speech zone was changed by Joujyuze (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928459 on 2021-05-15T19:38:16+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:38, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Sniper rifle. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. NebY (talk) 13:31, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:NebY may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. NebY (talk) 17:09, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Police abolition movement, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:10, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Maltranĉilo

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Maltranĉilo to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. Pages in foreign languages will not be kept here, and may be deleted if they are not translated into English. Thank you. Tol | Talk | Contribs 06:01, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Maltranĉilo

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Maltranĉilo, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:30, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alcohol in the United States military moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Alcohol in the United States military, is not suitable as written to remain published. It reads like an essay,and needs more information and more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 09:56, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notice!

--Joujyuze (talk) 13:25, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Sugar, you may be blocked from editing. Zefr (talk) 14:14, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Elaboration on your post on Cobi's talk page

Hey! I saw your comment on Cobi's talk page about ClueBot and I wanted to ask if you could elaborate since it appears you feel that the bot is targeting you specifically (which isn't true, it's a bot. bots don't have any bias as they just follow what they're told) and maybe I could help explain what's actually happening. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:12, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's just a way of speaking, it doesn't target me. --Joujyuze (talk) 12:48, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alcohol in the United States military

Hello, Joujyuze. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alcohol in the United States military, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of wars opposing nuclear states moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of wars opposing nuclear states, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 10:37, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello. Your recent edit to List of democratic schools appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 14:20, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Demand. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. NebY (talk) 19:07, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vietnam Game Development Alliance

The article Vietnam Game Development Alliance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Brand new, no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Slywriter (talk) 22:50, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of wars opposing nuclear states

Hello, Joujyuze. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of wars opposing nuclear states, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]