User talk:JossDude

Welcome

Hello, JossDude, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 15:09, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Helpme request: review of Gillette Mach 3

Gillette Mach 3. Please Could someone check this document as it is my first entry.

Hi JossDude! Sure, I can get someone to take a look at the article for you. Just so you know, {{helpme}} is really only meant to be used on your own talk page. I have asked your question here, at the Newcomers help page. Experienced editors will give you feedback soon! --Commander Keane 18:28, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gillette Mach 3

Hi JossDude,
I applaude you for creating Gillette Mach 3 your first article! I can tell that you put a lot of work into it. Since you requested that some people look over the article, I have a few suggestions for you. Don't worry if it seems like a lot, as you continue to contribute to Wikipedia most of the things will become second nature to you.

In your leading paragraph, you give very positive reviews of the razor. While that might not seem bad, Wikipedia operates on a neutral point of view policy. It is important that when writing articles, you are sure to not describe anything leaning one way or the other. Sentences such as "Mach 3 cartridges are the world's best selling razor blades.", do not quite follow that (unless it has been statistically proven, in which case it would be important to elaborate on exactly how they are the world's best selling razor, citing verifiable sources).
Only reading over the article generally, I have encountered a few of typographical errors. Most of them are grammatical, so it's hard for a spell-checker to catch them, but it's usually a good idea to read over your article a few times before posting it - or even getting someone else to read over it! More than one set of eyes is always good. A few that I saw:
- (Under Handle):"The Gillette Mach 3 is made from many different components this picture shows what the disassembled handle is constructed from." - This should probably be two different sentances, or at least split between "components" and "this".
- (Under Grips):"The placement of these ejector pins needs to be carefully thought about as; it is very easy to see on an injection mould..." - A semicolon is not needed here; if you wanted to keep it in, it should go after "about" and the "as" should be taken out.
When you get into describing the specific parts of the razor and its mechanics, the descriptions are sometimes hard to understand as the sentences seem to run on, especially in the "Grips" and "Main Rubberised Section" sections. I can tell that you are very knowlegable about the subject, but since many of the readers may not be, it is good to try to describe things in less-complicated terms.
In the sections "Main Cast Component" and "Joint Between Head and Handle", the writing turns to the first person point of view (you start saying "I" a lot). Like almost all encyclopedias, articles on Wikipeda should be in the third person. Also, you want to avoid addressing the reader by saying "you", as you do briefly in your leading paragraph ("when it is nearly white, you are supposed to change the blade.").
Lastly, consider taking a look at Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context. While you haven't made any excessive links, the guidelines give a better idea of what should and shouldn't be linked to.

I hope you find these suggestions helpful. I also hope I haven't overwhelmed you! Let me know if you have any other questions. -- Nataly a 21:42, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gillette Mach 3 Edits with a Jackhammer

Hey Joss ... Dude!

I just joined the Wiki Community today, and noticed your call for review on your Mach3 entry. I took the liberty of diving right in on the first section, please take a look at it when you can.

I already modified the article to address the first issue Natalya had with your intro paragraph.

I plan on continuing to work on this (if you don't mind). Since most of my efforts on Wiki will most likely be in an editorial capacity rather than authorship, I would welcome the chance to help you out here.

I asked Commander Keane about an issue, the "Mach 3" is trademarked and so forth as the "Mach3" (no space). I did a global search / replace on it, there were only about 5 instances of the full name in the article. But I'm not sure how to "add" "Mach3" as a header for a search.

Good article and fun reading. I never would have thought the Mach3 would be so interesting! It's a testament to how hard you've worked on this. Ziggles Metropolitan 22:46, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou

Thanks Alot from all of the great information, all is very appriciated.

Will try to get rid of the first person asap.

Feel free to edit and alter the whole section, as i said it is my first true entry and it needs work.

Thanks again Joss

Image copyright problem with Image:Opm.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Opm.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 00:18, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pro/DESKTOP

Hey JossDude, I noticed you moved the article "Pro Desktop" to "Pro/Desktop" (I moved it again to Pro/DESKTOP but that's not important). Be sure to use the "move" tab at the top of article (Article | Discussion | Edit this page | History | Move | Watch) when moving pages. Doing it this way moves the article history and generates an automatic redirect on the old page to the new page. I learned the hard way myself. Thanks! ♫ Bitch and Complain Sooner ♫ 22:41, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gillette Mach 3 Photo Modified, please comment

Hey there Joss. I modified [1] your photo of the Mach3, with the intention of working some more on the main entry. Do you have an issue with this labeling before I start? Just want to check with you before I do anything else.

Thanks.

Ziggy

Category:Dyslexic Wikipedians

Category:Dyslexic Wikipedians which you have included on your user page has been proposed for deletion you can comment at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Category:Wikipedians by mental condition. --Salix alba (talk) 16:40, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Skiing Christmas '05 034.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Skiing Christmas '05 034.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:12, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:A4_close.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:A4_close.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry so late

Sorry to get back to you so late, but I'm not fluent in Arabic. I know some greetings, I can "read" the script somewhat, meaning phonetically, and I know some vocabulary, but that's it. I am Muslim only. Sorry I got back to you so late. Later! -- JBull12 02:56, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Nipple.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nipple.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:38, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Your signature links your posts to you - please put alink to your user page in it at least. -- 9 cds^(talk) 09:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Just a happy Birthday message to you, JossDude, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!!! Have a great day!

Jorcoga 00:42, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Birthday Committee wishes you a very happy birthday! Enjoy your special day.

Many happy returns!!!

Thistheman 01:39, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Asylum Speakers.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Asylum Speakers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ Bigr Tex 20:11, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Smile...It Confuses People Album Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Smile...It Confuses People Album Cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Notre Dame Coll.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Notre Dame Coll.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Roll Deep.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Roll Deep.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Notre Dame Coll.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Notre Dame Coll.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Graffitti Panarama.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Graffitti Panarama.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shlomo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shlomo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:47, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ProD Design.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:ProD Design.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:35, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Hey, JossDude. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!-- §hep • ¡Talk to me! 02:31, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:TheHolyPictures.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:TheHolyPictures.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —Bkell (talk) 14:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Garth Heads

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Garth Heads, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Independent notability has not been asserted, and doesn't look like it will be

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 15:22, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:A4 close.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:22, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Amsterdam Population Graph.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:49, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday!!!

Here's to you on your birthday, JossDude! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! ~ Anastasia (talk) 15:19, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nipple by Joss Redfern.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nipple by Joss Redfern.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:47, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LSK (Outlaw album - cover art).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LSK (Outlaw album - cover art).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:49, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]