User talk:Josmith84

Welcome!

Hello, Josmith84!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Doug Weller talk 18:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm 344agg21. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Betar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The organization is described as a paramilitary organization by many of the sources, and its description is given later in the article. The type is also still listed as a PMO. Please provide a reasonable source for such a change (defining it directly if possible). jayhawker6 (talk) 23:11, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. _signed,Willondon (talk) 16:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i do use reliable sources. Josmith84 (talk) 01:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topics alert for all pages relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 18:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In other words, you are not allowed to make edits similar to those you have made

And that’s beside the fact that you violated WP:VERIFY, something you should never do especially in this area. Note that although we say Irgun has been described as a terrorist group, we don’t call it that in Wikipedia’s voice. Doug Weller talk 18:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But they were a terrorist group. So Wikipedia is silencing truth to protect people? Josmith84 (talk) 01:32, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]