User talk:Josiahcarrmusic
Speedy deletion nomination of What lurks among saints
[edit]Hello Josiahcarrmusic,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged What lurks among saints for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Asiaworldcity (talk) 02:44, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
The article What lurks among saints has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable musical by non-notable composers
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —teb728 t c 03:47, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of What lurks among saints for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article What lurks among saints is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What lurks among saints until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —teb728 t c 06:03, 3 November 2012 (UTC)