User talk:Joshua Davis

Technical articles in physics

In your page User:Joshua_Davis, you wrote

"One thing that I found very nice about mathematics articles on Wikipedia is that there are many technical articles that I can go to for use in my research."

I followed the link mathematics to check out an article like List_of_trigonometric_identities. I agree; I like to see more technical details that would be useful for learning and research. Perhaps you may want to check out the article Configuration integral (statistical mechanics) to see whether this type of technical article is what you meant? Vql (talk) 16:42, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologize

Hi Joshua, and welcome here. I just came to say that you don't need to apologize as profusely as you did in your edit summary, especially since you're making a good point.

As you have probably noticed, Wikipedia can be a rather strange place with hidden customs. You seem to be doing very well, but if you ever want to ask a question, feel free to contact me. Keep up the good work! Cheers, Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:40, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:physics/wip

In behalf of SFC9394, might I ask that you contribute some moderation and/or content for this page. Speaking for the prior contributors, --Ancheta Wis 06:17, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Parity

Hi Joshua, please reconsider your comments about parity. The parity operator is the operator that takes one between the disconnected components of a group (typically the two components of a rotation group). Ergo, the parity operator can never have determinant +1, since unitary/orthogonal transforms perserve the determinant, and det=+1 is the determinant of the connected component containing the identity. linas 15:18, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

tachyons

Can you check what I added to tachyon? Rotiro 10:20, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article needing your attention

Hi, can you please look at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluid entropy and vote? I think more physicists should participate in that particular vote. Thanks. Dan Gluck 13:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GCE and diversions

I had a feeling you were looking for something else. It's interesting that you mention black holes as an example of a non-extensive system...have you come across the work of Constantino Tsallis, and in particular, his nonextensive entropy? --HappyCamper 16:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ask around for "Landau potential" - if I find anything I'll let you know. Cheers! --HappyCamper 06:16, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This reminds me of grand potential...more later. --HappyCamper 20:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a look

Hi Joshua. Following PhysPhD's request, I've looked at this article which seems to be on the border of WP:OR and in my opinion deserved deletion due to WP:NOTE (all references except for the book have 8 citations at most) and possibly WP:COI (note the username of the article's author). As for the book (reference no. 1 of the article), I didn't read it of course. Before nominating it for deletion, I wanted to hear your opinion. Thanks. Dan Gluck 06:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A new search engine for books -- Zercle.com

Hi Joshua,

I would like to invite you and other Wikipedians to check out Zercle.com, which is a search engine for nonfiction books that I've just launched.

Zercle is designed to solve a problem that often plagues us on book sites such as Amazon.com: We spend a huge amount of time trying (and usually failing) to get an idea of what books are available in our particular categories of interest. For example, if you enter "Group Theory" in the search box at Amazon you'll get a hodgepodge of 1431 results, the first page of which is mostly psychology books! It's ridiculous.

What if you want a list of all undergraduate-level books in "Group Theory" that are in-print? Good luck. There's currently no way to get that information, unless you want to spend a few days going through 1431 results. In effect, we're still very much in the Stone Age when it comes to answering such questions.

With Zercle, however, volunteer editors will create, edit and maintain book groups which contain all of the books that are currently in-print in a given category. Zercle has developed a special method for analyzing the core subject of a book to determine which group or groups are appropriate for the book. This is all detailed in the "Instructions for book group editors" page.

Zercle is like Wikipedia in that it is edited by volunteers and thus starts off with very little content being there for users. Unlike Wikipedia, however, Zercle requires editors to register and that they be "knowledgeable enough" in the subject areas that they edit.

I've already started building a few groups on Zercle myself, in the "quantum mechanics" area, since I'm knowledgeable enough there (BS Physics). If you enter "quantum mechanics" into the Title box on the Zercle front page you'll see those groups. If you also enter, say, "Griffiths" into the Author box, you'll see the specific group which contains the QM book written by that author. I've only just started these groups, so none of them are yet complete. But, as I've already alluded, the idea is to eventually have groups that are complete, so that users can easily discover what books are available in their categories of interest, and authors can pretty much be guaranteed that users have an easy way of discovering their book.

Once Zercle gets going we will no longer have to waste countless hours on Amazon only to get a tiny glimpse of what books are available in our particular categories of interest. We'll simply enter the title (or title words and maybe an author's last name) from any book in the category into the Zercle query box, and instantly have at our fingertips a *complete* list of the other books in that category, with links to their corresponding Amazon pages.

Editors are needed in all non-fiction category areas (Zercle does not support *fiction* books). For more info, go to http://www.zercle.com/ and look at the "About" page. For questions/comments: paul at zercle dot com.

Thanks very much for reading this.

Paul White (developer of Zercle)

Emwave 23:41, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion valued

Would you care to take a look at WP:Articles_for_deletion/Martin_Greiter ? I voted for deletion, but your opinion either way would be useful. Some of the more recent votes look like an effort at vote-stacking by fake users. Dark Formal (talk) 17:25, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review for the list of baryons

Hi,

I noticed that you had an interest in particle physics, so I wondered you could head over the List of baryons and Talk:List of baryons pages a give some feedback. I'm currently trying to bring that article to Featured List status, but I'm not a particle physicist so I probably made half a dozen mistakes. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Headbomb (talk · contribs) 21:38, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Physics participation

You received this message because your were on the old list of WikiProject Physics participants.

On 2008-06-25, the WikiProject Physics participant list was rewritten from scratch as a way to remove all inactive participants, and to facilitate the coordination of WikiProject Physics efforts. The list now contains more information, is easier to browse, is visually more appealing, and will be maintained up to date.

If you still are an active participant of WikiProject Physics, please add yourself to the current list of WikiProject Physics participants. Headbomb {ταλκ – WP Physics: PotW} 15:28, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Garrett Lisi

I would like to mention that I'm trying to get a reasonable and NPOV version of Antony Garrett Lisi's page, that currently has been under censorship from User SherryNugil that does not want to include the current status of the Lisi's theory and that wants to keep all the articles and interviews and tv appearances and blog entries and forum discussions about Lisi. Not even for Nobel Prize Laureates there is such a complete list. I am also reporting that user for several reasons and it would be good if you could participate to the discussion giving your opinion, given that in the past you contributed to that page. Look at the discussion page for the last happenings. 24.7.128.58 (talk) 16:21, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A McLaren For You!

	Welcome To Wikipedia!
	Hello Joshua Davis, and welcome to Wikipedia! As always, remember to sign your posts using 4 tildes (4 of these ~.) Otherwise we won't even know who typed in the comment. Jayemd (talk) 15:58, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome but I've been editing WP for years. Just had a typo when I meant to put in my sig. Joshua Davis (talk) 16:11, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Joshua Davis. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]