User talk:JoshMaka

Concern regarding Draft:Bastien Fazincani

Hello, JoshMaka. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bastien Fazincani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bastien Fazincani

Hello, JoshMaka. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bastien Fazincani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:07, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bastien Fazincani has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bastien Fazincani. Thanks! microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 19:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bastien Fazincani (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Isochrone was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Tennis coaches must meet what is known as the general notability guideline. In a nutshell, they must have had significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic.

Almost all of the sources here are from blogs or the same, unreliable website. For sports personalities, news websites are best. The few sources that look like news sites barely mention the subject ("significant coverage" is required).

This means that the subject of this article is likely not notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. Unless reliable (i.e. independently published) sources that the subject of this article is the main part of exists, then this will not change.

Additionally, the article structure is very confusing. Please follow the style available at Template:Biography.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bastien Fazincani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Isochrone (talk) 21:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JoshMaka! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – Isochrone (talk) 21:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]