User talk:Josepht404

May 2013

Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Mass–energy equivalence, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, DVdm (talk) 17:30, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mass–energy equivalence with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 17:31, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Thomas & Friends with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 17:36, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:DVdm. Wikipelli ^Talk 17:38, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 17:41, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Josepht404 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

'I was 14 years old when I did that stuff and I actually want to contribute now'

Decline reason:

No response to question in 3 days. PhilKnight (talk) 01:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Okay, I'll consider an unblock, but first can you tell me what articles you would like to edit? Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]