Jump to content

User talk:Josephjames.me/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Josephjames.me, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Torreslfchero (talk) 14:13, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Jannat 2

[edit]

Please do not re-add that massive WP:QUOTEFARM. I've explained on the article's talk page why that is inappropriate for WIkipedia. That kind of massive overquoting is more appropriate for a movie review site. Until such time as you can explain how that is compliant with policy, do not re-add. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Invitation

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Josephjames.me/Archive 1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

Visit the Teahouse
This message automatically delivered by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 21:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ek Tha Tiger

[edit]

Hello, I'm Zeeyanketu. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Ek Tha Tiger that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 13:51, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message! Josephjames.me (talk) 09:43, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you have seen the movie, then try to expand plot section too. Thanks!---zeeyanketu talk to me 10:52, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the plot summary of the current version is well written. Josephjames.me (talk) 11:28, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

[edit]
You did a good job at OMG!. Keep up the good work. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 17:18, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

Jonathan and Sarah, Teahouse hosts 02:16, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paani - Upcoming movie.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Paani - Upcoming movie.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Paani - Upcoming movie.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:32, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kammath and Kammath - Poster.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kammath and Kammath - Poster.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:46, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lokpal (2013) - Poster.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Lokpal (2013) - Poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lokpal

[edit]

Please note that Wikipedia only reports on professional reviewers and critics say. I don't think that most of the reviews that you recently re-added to Lokpal meet the criteria described in Wikipedia:WikiProject_Films/Style_guidelines#Critical_response. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:35, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But how could those sites be unreliable ones. It could not be proved that they are unreliable, according to Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable_sources and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Please reply. Thanks! Josephjames.me (talk) 10:12, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Only professional review sites are allowed. See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Films/Style_guidelines#Critical_response. It is up to you to show that the site/reviewer is a professional and noteworthy reviewer and is not just 'some guy on the web'. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:39, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See, I read the link. The reviews that were added, as it could be seen, were not completely unprofessional ones. I hope you understand. Thanks! Josephjames.me (talk) 12:57, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I understand how you may have thought they were appropriate, but "not completely unprofessional " is not the standard; "completely professional" is the standard. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:07, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See, there are occasional exceptions to some articles, as it could be seen in Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means#Use_common_sense. Please understand it. Thanks! Josephjames.me (talk) 13:10, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot just "ignore all the rules" - you need to follow the complete guideline and show beyond a doubt that it "it improves the encyclopedia" before you can ignore. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:13, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How would it not improve the encyclopedia, by adding some reviews to a movie page? It only enhances the encyclopedia, if we add some precious information. Please understand it. Thanks! Josephjames.me (talk) 13:22, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can pull all kinds of crap off the web that will not improve the encyclopedia. random reviews by joe- blow-i-put-up-a-website-so-i-can-spout-my-opinion are not going to improve the encyclopedia, they will most certainly make it worse. (and while you can remove other's comments from your talk page, you should not ever edit other users comments on talk pages.) -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:32, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think I cannot come to a conclusion in this topic, by conversing with you. Thanks for spending your time. Josephjames.me (talk) 07:45, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Your addition to Gippi has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Psychonaut (talk) 08:28, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Jannat 2, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.andhrareporter.com/telugu-movie-reviews/1494-jannat-2, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Jannat 2 saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Psychonaut (talk) 08:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See, I have not added any content from http://www.andhrareporter.com/telugu-movie-reviews/1494-jannat-2. I just edited the plot section added by another user. Please check the page history. Thanks! Josephjames.me (talk) 08:43, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did check the history. This edit of yours makes it seem as though you added the material. However, I see you had removed it in an earlier edit, and then added it back again. I'll check farther back in the history and notify the original contributor if there's still a problem. Apologies for the oversight; you can remove this section from your talk page if you'd like. —Psychonaut (talk) 08:48, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK! I am quite sure I have not added it. But still, please check it and notify me. However, thanks for the message! Have a good day ahead. Josephjames.me (talk) 08:56, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Baadshah

[edit]

Hello, I'm Raghusri. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Baadshah (2013 film) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Raghusri 09:29, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adding references

[edit]

Hello,
When you add references to filsm in 'List of Malayalam films of 2013' article, please don't remove the existing refernce links. You can add the Nowrunning.com references as additional links to the existing ones. It is observed that some of the existing links; including Rediff, The hindu links; were deleted when you added the new links. It is better for an article to have as many number of valid reference links as possible
Anish Viswa 09:48, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Malayalam films of 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sai Kumar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Salalah Mobiles - poster.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Salalah Mobiles - poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:01, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:'Bangalore Days' 2014 Malayalam Film - Poster.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:'Bangalore Days' 2014 Malayalam Film - Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:49, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:'Bangalore Days' 2014 Malayalam Film - Poster.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:'Bangalore Days' 2014 Malayalam Film - Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:27, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to K. Gireesh Kumar may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [Jayaram]], [[Gopika]], [[Nivetha Thomas]], [[Innocent (actor)|Innocent]], [[Suraj Venjaramoodu]], [[Madhu Warrier]
  • | [[Jayaram]], [[Serah (actress) | Serah]], Priyanka, [[Jagathy Sreekumar], [[Salim Kumar]], [[Balachandran Chullikad]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:07, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ek Villain may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {| class="wikitable infobox {{#ifeq:{{{state|}}}|plain||collapsible {{{state|}}}}}" style="float: {{{

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:59, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Satya 2 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • page=shownews&articleid=6237&nCat=|title=Boxofficeindia.com}}{{Dead link|date=July 2014}}}</ref> and was declared a "disaster" by Box Office India.<ref name="Verd">{{cite web|url=http://www.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:14, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts in the page Singham Returns

[edit]

Please join the discussion at Talk:Singham_Returns#Gross Collection.Rameshnta909 (talk) 15:10, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tryst with Destiny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Juxtaposition. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bang Bang! may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • on 2 October 2014 with early screenings in Dubai on 1 October.{{citation needed|date=October 2014}}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

dont update aagadu gross

[edit]

with irrrelevant references like great andhra, thokka andhra etc. I am waiting for THE HINDU update on actual gross Bhishek (talk) 12:35, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Highest-grossing Tamil films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Economic Times. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:56, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Highest-grossing Tamil films may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | 4 || ''[[Sivaji (film)|[Sivaji]]'' || 2007 || AVM Studios || {{INRConvert|128|c}} || <ref>{{cite web|url=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:12, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Genelia D'Souza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jai Ho. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image revert

[edit]

The modified image you had uploaded is modified by yourself. but looks like the first version was more better considering the style and picturization as the poster should reveal the theme of the film. The first one is the better. i request to revert it. Thanks UniGuard (talk) 14:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Samsaaram Aarogyathinu Haanikaram 2014 film poster.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Samsaaram Aarogyathinu Haanikaram 2014 film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:10, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of edits on 'List of highest-grossing Indian films'

[edit]

Hello!

This message is to ask you why are you reverting edits on 'List of highest-grossing Indian films'? The information remains too outdated after those reversions. This is just a polite question as to why are you reverting. We have a reliable source here. What else is needed?

Regards

Kashisharora11 (talk) 15:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The film pk made 6.11 crore worldwide so get your facts right — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sadikurrahman1985 (talk • contribs) 13:11, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Varsham 2014-Malayalam film poster.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Varsham 2014-Malayalam film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:36, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Varsham 2014-Malayalam film poster.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Varsham 2014-Malayalam film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:49, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Happy Ending 2014 Hindi film poster.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Happy Ending 2014 Hindi film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:33, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

[edit]

Removal of better source tag in List of highest-grossing Tamil films for Mankatha..According to Wiki standards of Verifiability there is no such actual Tweet or webarchive based on which the gross has been quoted.The Distributor Sun pictures as mentioned in the source has not released it in an Official press release nor having the tweet in their official Twitter handle and the statement was not released in any news papers.A reputable source need not always be reliable..You have not given a proper explanation(just saying that the source is reliable doesn't meet wiki standards) for removal of better source tag.If you have other reliable source please provide or participate in the discussion on the Articles talk page before removing tags! MeeGhaMan (talk) 18:18, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me?

[edit]

Hello JosephJames.me

I always love to create some good articles on Wikipedia, i always write the articles with valid investigation and with trust able online sources. Nowadays one User named TheRedPenOfDoom is editing the articles that i created like a mad person saying he need more references and all. If this TheRedPenOfDoom is still editing all the articles in Wikipedia, he will delete all the contents as on his madness. I create articles always for persons whom all are included in celebrity category of Malayalam Film industry. Last day TheRedPenOfDoom edited the article created by me about "Madonna Sebastian" where i give valid reference as IndiaTimes. But that guy removed all that articles without checking the reference.

Here's the link of Original Article that i created. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Madonna_Sebastian&oldid=668007387


And the link of article removed by TheRedPenOfDoom : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Madonna_Sebastian&oldid=668008104


You can also check the valid references and also her facebook, all details are taken from all that. So i want TheRedPenOfDoom to be blocked from Wikipedia from these types of editings. You know in Kerala, we only have option to update Wikipedia articles by checking either through their Facebook profiles and all, no media reference will ask about their date of birth and all.

Hope you will block TheRedPenOfDoom as fast as possible

Regards, Jose Varghese — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josu4u (talk • contribs) 06:03, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Attarintiki Daredi

[edit]

Hi. I know that the Infobox film template states that Gross value should be provided. But sadly, Telugu film industry is the only one to consider distributor share and not the gross/nett values. That was why we had only an estimate and no exact gross figures are available. Once they are available, i myself shall change it. Please be patient. Also, IBTimes India is much reliable when compared to Oneindia Entertainment. That was why i used 550 million as the film's budget. Yours sincerely, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:06, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update — Found the correct gross value at Business Standard. I have updated the same in the article and placed the same in the infobox as per Template:Infobox film. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:42, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Baahubali: The Beginning

[edit]

Now that the article has been protected for a week, it should allow the best cleanup possible. One thing you are good at, you can shift all BO related info to the BO section from the infobox. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:16, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Josephjames.me/Archive_1&oldid=1151032199"