User talk:Joselv83/sandbox
Acknowledgements
[edit]Thank you all for your Reviews, it is greatly appreciated!
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
[edit]Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User:Angela Sandy |
---|---|
Date of review | 5/13/2013 |
Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Joselv83 |
URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joselv83/sandbox |
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 05/13/13 |
Date review submitted to instructor | 05/13/13 |
Length of edit (too long/too short) | The length of the article is good length |
Image (needed/appropriate) | n/a |
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | The review of the textbook is accurate |
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | n/a |
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | The article is accurate to I/O Psych |
Wikiformatting | The formatting is good |
Grammar & composition | Good grammar & composition |
Other comments | Good work! |
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
[edit]Name of student reviewer: User: Cgchapman Replace with username for version on talk page**
Date of review: 05/10/2013
Name of editor: User: Joselv83
Replace with username for version on talk page**
URL of editor’s Userpage:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joselv83/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/10/2013
Date review submitted to instructor:
Length of edit (too long/too short): Good length
Image (needed/appropriate): Not needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Edit information accurate to textbook
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Edit information accurate and relevant to I/O Psychology
Wikiformatting: Good Formatting
Grammar & composition: Good grammer
Other comments:None
Cgchapman (talk) 15:56, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
[edit]--Keronica Grant (talk) 18:45, 9 May 2013 (UTC) |}
Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User: Keronica Grant |
---|---|
Date of review | 5/9/2013 |
Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Joselv83 |
URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joselv83/sandbox |
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 05/8/13 |
Date review submitted to instructor | 05/8/13 |
Length of edit (too long/too short) | good length |
Image (needed/appropriate) | n/a |
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Accurate |
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | Primary |
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Accurate to I/O Psych |
Wikiformatting | good formatting |
Grammar & composition | Good grammar. |
Other comments | Good edit! |
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
[edit]Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User:Neffateriet |
---|---|
Date of review | 5/8/2013 |
Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Joselv83 |
URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joselv83/sandbox |
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 05/8/13 |
Date review submitted to instructor | 05/8/13 |
Length of edit (too long/too short) | good length |
Image (needed/appropriate) | n/a |
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Accurate |
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | N/A |
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Accurate to I/O Psych |
Wikiformatting | OK format but more can be add |
Grammar & composition | Good grammar. perfect. |
Other comments | Good idea for an edit, but add bullets for more points |
Neffateriet (talk) 9:36, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
[edit]Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User:Azahur |
---|---|
Date of review | 5/8/2013 |
Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Joselv83 |
URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joselv83/sandbox |
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 05/8/13 |
Date review submitted to instructor | 05/8/13 |
Length of edit (too long/too short) | good length for the article |
Image (needed/appropriate) | n/a |
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Accurate |
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | Yes |
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Accurate to I/O Psych |
Wikiformatting | OK format but more can be add |
Grammar & composition | Good grammar. perfect. |
Other comments | Good edit |
Azahur (talk) 04:50, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
[edit]Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User: VIMMYSEAJATAN |
---|---|
Date of review | 5/9/2013 |
Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Joselv83 |
URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joselv83/sandbox |
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 05/9/13 |
Date review submitted to instructor | 05/9/13 |
Length of edit (too long/too short) | okay |
Image (needed/appropriate) | n/a |
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Accurate |
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | Primary |
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Accurate to I/O Psych |
Wikiformatting | good formatting |
Grammar & composition | Good grammar. Look at the "training" sentence a letter is missing from one of the words. |
Other comments | Good edit! |
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
[edit]Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User: VIMMYSEAJATAN |
---|---|
Date of review | 5/9/2013 |
Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Joselv83 |
URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joselv83/sandbox |
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 05/9/13 |
Date review submitted to instructor | 05/9/13 |
Length of edit (too long/too short) | good |
Image (needed/appropriate) | n/a |
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Accurate |
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | Primary |
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Accurate to I/O Psych |
Wikiformatting | good formatting used bullet points |
Grammar & composition | Good grammar. |
Other comments | Good edit! (This review is for Psychological testing). |
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
[edit]Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User: F.Moshammad |
---|---|
Date of review | 5/10/2013 |
Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Joselv83 |
URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joselv83/sandbox |
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 05/10/13 |
Date review submitted to instructor | 05/10/13 |
Length of edit (too long/too short) | appropriate length |
Image (needed/appropriate) | n/a |
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Accurate to text book information |
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | Primary |
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Accurate to I/O Psych |
Wikiformatting | good formatting |
Grammar & composition | Good grammar. |
Other comments | Good job! |
F.Moshammad (talk) 05:24, 10 May 2013 (UTC
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
[edit]Name of student reviewer: Alyssa Bhagwandin
Date of review: 5/15/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Wikipedia User: Joselv83
URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joselv83/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/15/13
Date review submitted to instructor: 05/15/13
Length of edit (too long/too short): Length was good wasn’t too short or long
Image (needed/appropriate): N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): information from the text was accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes it is adherent to I/O Psychology
Wikiformatting: good formatting
Grammar & composition: grammar and composition was good
Other comments: good job!