User talk:Joseandricardo

Sock

It would appear that this account is used by Jose Arellano when he has forgotten that most of his entries have been done as Jose and Ricardo. -- RHaworth 18:45, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

frivolious

Please do not make frivolious articles like 1 0 4 8 5 7 6. If it is about the year with that number, it has to be 1048576. If it is about the number itself, it has to be 1048576 (number). Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 23:40, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And it should be 1098 BC rather than 1098 B C. Thanks for that too. :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 23:42, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Either way, please do not put redirects in categories, it has no purpose. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 23:43, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Central Unified School District 2006-2007 school year calendar

Please stop recreating articles which have been deleted by community consensus. Recreation of such content is considred vandalism. If you disagree with the deletion, you can discuss it at WP:DRV. User:Zoe|^(talk) 22:39, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise for Yearly Calendar for Herndon-Barstow. This was a) unencyclopedic - Wikipedia is not a free host, b) unformatted - we do not dump raw HTML into a Wikipedia edit box - we use Wiki mark up, c) probably a {{copyvio}} as suggested by the HTML. -- RHaworth 18:37, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lists

Please stop making lists like List of Summer Olympics, List of FIFA World Cups, and Lists of Winter Olympics. These already exist at different locations and, as such, I have redirected those articles you made to the other locations. Metros232 13:47, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

July 15, 2067 and January 2007

Please don't create such silly articles, they are not helpful. Nothing of that information is really important or that relevant. It does not make sense to make articles about every month and year in existance. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 19:55, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

And please use an edit summary at all times, so that others see what you do. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 19:57, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Number articles.

Please stop creating articles about numbers without connotations, content, or importance. It may be considered vandalism. - Kookykman|(t)e 18:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

numbers

Please do not add pointless articles about random numbers.--Anthony.bradbury 18:30, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 1, etc.

Please do not enter holidays which move from year to year under specific dates, unless you can get agreement for all such to be listed. Ash Wednesday, Mothers Day, Easter, etc. are not to be included in individual Month Day articles.. (You've been warned about this before, but I think the warning was accidentally deleted.) — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 01:25, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2100

I redirected this to 21st century. Please read Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Numbers and_dates. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 21:39, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joseandricardo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please include the original unblock request.

Decline reason:

No reason given. -- Netsnipe ► 03:58, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of User:Science3456 . As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All your edits have been reverted.
To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism. Big top 01:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Joseandricardo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

207.200.116.69 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

sock of User:Science3456

Blocking administrator: not provided.

Decline reason: You aren't autoblocked. Please read the first line of this template before it was declined. Daniel .Bryant 05:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]