User talk:Jose and Ricardo

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Jose and Ricardo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Herostratus 05:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi guys

Hi guys (I figure by your user name that there's two of you?). I'm looking at your edit history... I'm trying to figure out what you guys are into. Can I help you figure out areas that you are interested in where we need work done? Message me back! Herostratus 05:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Atlantic hurricane seasons

Please read the message on the edit page and don't add years beyond 2006. That's what the Post-2006 page is for. Those articles shouldn't have been created and were merged onto the Post-2006 page for a reason. There just isn't enough information for them to be useful. We also want to discourage creation of articles for years beyond 2010 for that reason. -- §Hurricane E RIC§^Damagesarchive 23:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Please do not create articles or redirects of the form 1 0 9 2. They have no use. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 23:50, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing the encyclopedia for disruptive editing. This block is for a period of 12 hours. Although previously asked, you continue to make nonsensical articles, causing extra cleanup tasks. Some examples are the articles:

(The RED links above indicate that other admins have already deleted these pages) As you seem to want to work with dates, I suggest you review Wikipedia:Naming conventions (numbers and dates) for community accepted guidelines for dealing with these articles. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:51, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

July 12 (disagumbination)

July 12 (disagumbination) has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt that this page was unnecessary. Please review WP:DAB for guidelines on disambiguation pages. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the prod notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. NickelShoe (Talk) 22:21, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

June 8, 2006

June 8, 2006 has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this information might not be encyclopedic. Please review WP:NOT for the relevant policy. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so. If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the prod notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. `NickelShoe (Talk) 04:26, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bad redirects

Please do not create redirects of the form 0743, 0002, 4/8/2005, or 3/14/03, they are not helpful. Please stick to established conventions. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:40, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make redirects like October 1979 either. It is best to make those into October 1979. It does not make any sense to make redirects for any combination of month and year. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 05:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bad redirects again

Please do not recreate redirects of the form '90's and 2 0 1 5. They are not named appropriately. You have been told about this many times before. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 18:46, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bad redirects yet again

Please do not create redirects of the form 2 0 1 6; you have been told before that they are not useful and against existing conventions. Your actions are being disruptive. Please stop. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 23:13, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Future article

This article was deleted by an administrator (not me), and you restored it. Please do not do that, such an article is not helpful. Redirects of the form 853rd century are not appropriate either. Please do not be disruptive. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 23:15, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Big numbers

2 of your articles on numbers in the Googol family are up for deletion, Googolquinquagintiplex and Googolseptendeciplex, along with the category you created. I do not think it's a good idea to continue creating these articles, have a look at Wikipedia:Notability (numbers) if you're interested in creating number articles. - Hahnch e n 01:16, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not re-create deleted articles. Doing so is considered vandalism. Thanks. --Hetar 02:35, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And also do not create articles that are just like the ones that have been deleted before, like May 6 (disambiguation). Articles like this are just a waste of your and our time. Thank you, Kusma (討論) 03:25, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

... or June 8, 2006. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 22:07, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Distant future article

I deleted Wikipedia:Distant future article, as it is a reiteration of the article Wikipedia:Future article which was deleted before. Please stop adding articles of that kind, they are not helpful.

You seem to be paying no attention to people's requests to not fool around. If you continue creating silly articles and redirects you will be blocked for disruption. Stop. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:12, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Same about May 1, 2006. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:13, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

10001

Please guys, don't you understand that creating this article 10001 (number) was silly? And it was also full of errors. Don't you have something better to do? Some people here are trying to create an encyclopedia. Please either do something helpful, or go play somewhere else. Thank you. Lambiam ^Talk 12:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Numbers of the googol family and Category:Number families up for deletion

See Categories_for_deletion#Category:Numbers_of_the_googol_family Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 13:01, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Central Unified School District 2006-2007 school year calendar

Would you please stop copying templates into articles which have been deleted. (Or, for that matter, into articles which have not been deleted.) I'm not an admin, but this second recreation of a deleted article is bordering on vandalism. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 17:50, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User rename

See Wikipedia:Changing username for the correct way to change your name. This redirect might lead to deletion of your entire account, as it makes it difficult to see who has done what. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 22:11, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted User:Jose Arellano and its talk page. Just by moving your user page does not rename you as a user. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 22:36, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your move of User:Jose and Ricardo to User:Jose Arellano. As before, see Wikipedia:Changing username for the correct way of doing it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Arthur Rubin (talk • contribs) .

Yes please. Read carefully what we wrote above. You cannot change your username by moving your user page. You willl still be stuck with User:Jose and Ricardo. Please visit Wikipedia:Changing username to see how to do things correctly. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 01:32, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please endorse the request that I made at Wikipedia:Changing_username#Jose Arelleno. It will (probably) be done if you request it. (Be sure to sign your name with ~~~~ in that request.) — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 17:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2100

I redirected this to 21st century. Please read Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Numbers and_dates. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 21:39, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of 'New Year's Day' observed