User talk:Jose Augusto Bittencourt

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines for academics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jose Augusto Bittencourt/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:19, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Jose Augusto Bittencourt, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:19, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:José A. Bittencourt concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:José A. Bittencourt, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:José A. Bittencourt concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:José A. Bittencourt, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:José A. Bittencourt

Hello, Jose Augusto Bittencourt. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "José A. Bittencourt".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 20:09, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jose Augusto Bittencourt (September 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jose Augusto Bittencourt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 19:27, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, I'm PlyrStar93. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Wikipedia:Requested articles/Biography/By profession— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 15:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Requested articles/Biography/By nationality. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 16:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Requested articles/Biography/By nationality, you may be blocked from editing. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 16:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Requested articles/Biography/By profession. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 16:14, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 16:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jose Augusto Bittencourt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is not vandalism. I was trying to include a requested article in the biography section, by profession and by nationality and perhaps it was typed and included in a not proper space. I'm sorry for any inconvenience it have caused Jose Augusto Bittencourt (talk) 17:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Although the apology is noted and appreciated, you need a bit more time to think through the implications of what you've been doing. (See my comments below.) -- Hoary (talk) 11:15, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

~~You're blocked for vandalism, and I see no vandalism. (And I appreciate the contrition.) However, I do see disruptive editing. The disruption~~ You have been editing destructively (particularly this edit). This may have been vandalism, though it might just have been carelessness. That aside, you've been editing disruptively. The disruption has two elements:

You were (re)adding an article draft. The page you were editing is a compilation of suggestions for articles, not drafts for articles.
You were quickly re-adding material. (See Wikipedia's policy on "edit warring".)

Sooner or later, you will be unblocked. Until then, ponder this: You, calling yourself Jose Augusto Bittencourt, are keen to create or have created an article on Jose Augusto Bittencourt. That the names are the same raises a question:

Are you in fact Jose Augusto Bittencourt?

If you are him, then your article about him would be an autobiography. Wikipedia does not want autobiographies.

If you are not him, then you are violating user name policy.

If Jose Augusto Bittencourt merits an article in Wikipedia, then somebody independent of him will eventually write one. There is no need for Bittencourt or somebody related to him to accelerate this process. -- Hoary (talk) 22:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC) ~~Deletion~~ and addition made after examining the list of contributions. -- Hoary (talk) 11:15, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to explain briefly: At first, I did not notice there was a major formatting difference between submission of an Article Draft (which I had already prepared, but was declined) and a Request (suggested to me by the reviewer), which resulted in replacing some typed data in the wrong places in your site. This misunderstanding was due to the fact that it is not clear, in your site, how to proceed in formatting and where to properly place a Request for an Article. Also, I was not aware that Wikipedia is so strongly reluctant about inclusion of Autobiographies. I believe my attempt to contribute to Wikipedia ends here. Jose Augusto Bittencourt (talk) 12:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

afC comment -- moved to right place

{{AFC comment|1=Actually, the relevant standard is not the [[WP:GNG], but rather WP:PROF This essentially requires documenting him as an authroity in his subject, and is usually proved by indicated how much his papers have been cited. But it has to be written to avoid making judgments,. First give the biographical information--degrees, and positions, in chronological order. Don't make links to external sources within the article--link instead to the corresponding WP article if there is one. If the link is intended as a reference, format it as a reference. Don't refer to self-published books. Don't give details of children and hobbies. DGG ( talk ) 05:11, 4 October 2017 (UTC)}}