User talk:Jorgeg3d
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Jorgeg3d! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! TFD (talk) 16:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
[edit]
Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 17:40, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- —I posted factual data, my comment was based on facts.
- As I said earlier, if you have specific suggestions for improvement and they are justified by policy or reliable sources, you can mention them on the talk page. Not just factual, but supported by good sources. Please stop using the page to complain about other editors or to label the article itself a conspiracy theory. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 18:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory, you may be blocked from editing. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 18:36, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- — This is not a forum of thought and discussion. How can we have a discussion when we are being shut down? I tried to make the original post better by posting examples of cultural marxism. But you refuse to post it. How is that fair? Anyone with internet can look it up themselves.
- Its clear you only want to see discussions that support the original thread, not oppose it. Thats not how freedom of speech works. You must take both sides equally.
- WP:NOTFREESPEECH, WP:FREE. tgeorgescu (talk) 19:19, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- — Thats fine, but where are the rebuttals? Nowhere to be found. At least debate my standing, you can't because it is true. Oh and for the record, I can care less about being banned from editing. What's the point in that, if its only for those who share the same ideology?
- Wrong address: this is not Debatepedia. We're not debating anything, as in debate championships. tgeorgescu (talk) 20:05, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- — Thats fine, but where are the rebuttals? Nowhere to be found. At least debate my standing, you can't because it is true. Oh and for the record, I can care less about being banned from editing. What's the point in that, if its only for those who share the same ideology?
- WP:NOTFREESPEECH, WP:FREE. tgeorgescu (talk) 19:19, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- — Whether or not its a debate, I posted facts. You don't like the facts because it doesn't support your agenda. That's very totalitarian/Marxist of you.
- Ridiculous, I'm a Western liberal. Do you know what Western liberalism means for me? Reagan, Thatcher and Bush 41. tgeorgescu (talk) 09:49, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- — Whether or not its a debate, I posted facts. You don't like the facts because it doesn't support your agenda. That's very totalitarian/Marxist of you.
Discretionary sanctions alert
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Firefangledfeathers (talk) 18:39, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
WP:NOTFORUM and reliable sources
[edit]Hi there. I'd like to explain a little more what others have said about your posts to Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory. If you want to change content on Wikipedia, posting a your view of the subject on the Talk page is not sufficient. You need to supply reliable sources that support your view. WP:NOTFORUM refers to this issue.
WP:RS outlines what reliable sources are. You will find that a Youtube video from The Heritage Foundation is not considered a reliable source. I hope this makes things clearer. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 08:18, 17 June 2021 (UTC)