User talk:Jordynederer
| This user is a student editor in Washington_University_in_St._Louis/Gender_and_Politics_in_Global_Perspective_(Spring_2023) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Jordynederer, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 00:46, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Second wave feminism.jpeg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Second wave feminism.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:Strike1.jpeg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Strike1.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Jsp100 Peer Review
[edit]With strengths, I believe that the proposed section on intersectionality is a really great idea and a strength of the article. It applies important information that we’ve learned in the class, but it also connects really well with the topic that highlights a contrast to the single-axis framework of white feminism. Although, intersectionality is touched on in the original article’s section on” 21st century intersectional feminism,” so it’s probably best to avoid being repetitive.
With potential changes, I know that the article now has a section on “Black feminist icons” in the article. I wonder what the reason for this is? I am not sure if that necessarily fits into an article on White feminism. I understand that it’s important to highlight intersectionality and perhaps important figures that contributed to that movement but an emphasis on only specifically black feminist icons seems out of place and perhaps should be more generalized. I am just wondering how this would integrate well with the rest of the piece? I think considering changing the title and making it focus on people who have contributed to intersectionality feminism in general could be helpful.
I know that there is a plan to expand on white feminism in the American legal system. This sounds really interesting. I am wondering if you are planning to use more sources than just the one listed (in that section). I think using more sources in general throughout the piece could allow for more perspectives that could further develop the article. In addition, I think more images and greater visual organization could further strengthen the article. I think at the moment the article is underdeveloped, though the article is on the right track. Jsp100 (talk) 15:38, 3 April 2023 (UTC)