User talk:Jordantrsonlychild

December 2020

Hello, I'm Carbrera. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Music Sounds Better with U, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Carbrera (talk) 02:44, 14 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Music Sounds Better with U, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Carbrera (talk) 22:08, 26 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Big Time Rush discography

What makes the sources you used at Big Time Rush discography reliable? You've yet to provide any reason for reverting my edits despite my multiple notices explaining that your edits use non-official sources. Carbrera (talk) 01:06, 31 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

How do you know it’s unreliable? Please elaborate because you have yet to tell me why dpacnc.com is unreliable. So go ahead and explain your reasoning Jordantrsonlychild (talk) 12:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I told you several times why the source was unreliable (See [1], [2], [3]). The source you used was authored by Nickelodeon, which is BTR's label. Sales and certifications need to come from sources that are not a conflict of interest. Carbrera (talk) 18:45, 31 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

I dont even understand a single word you said. Jordantrsonlychild (talk) 19:29, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At this point i dont care. Just police the Big Time Rush discography page because thats all you do. I mean you went as far as to delete my Holiday Bundle page too so whatever. Whats the point anymore Jordantrsonlychild (talk) 19:32, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jordantrsonlychild, I am only here to edit constructively. I don't want to make your Wikipedia experience a poor one, but a lot of your edits could be classified as disruptive. I don't think you've taken the time to read up on policy and I think it is creating tension. You are a rather new user to Wikipedia and I think this could all be resolved if you thoroughly read WP:NALBUMS and WP:NSONGS. This will only benefit you as you will soon understand why editors, and not just myself, have been reverting a lot of your edits. Carbrera (talk) 20:48, 31 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Then with that being said an article like Elm St. (Ryan Cabrera album) should be deleted. I mean it has rarely any sources let alone information but thats just me Jordantrsonlychild (talk) 20:56, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Love Like Woe, you may be blocked from editing. Carbrera (talk) 00:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

How am I disrupting? You gonna block me for what? What did I do? Is it that serious? All I did was add heatseeker charts and you acting as if i put profanity all over the Love Like Woe page. All you do is harass me 24/7 on wiki. Maybe YOU should get blocked. No matter what I put on Wikipedia, YOU get rid of it. Mate it's not that serious. I added Love Like Woe heatseeker charts and you acting like i vandalized the page.

We just had this discussion a week ago. Your editing history indicates that you have zero intention of following Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. But please, prove me wrong and read WP:CHARTS, specifically the sections WP:CHARTMATH and WP:BADCHARTS. This will likely continue to happen until you agree to edit constructively and responsibly. Carbrera (talk) 01:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

I see other articles that have heatseeker songs and billboard hot 100 charts in the same section. So whats your point?

If you would take the time to read these helpful links that several users have provided for you, you would understand that Heatseeker Songs is a component chart of the Hot 100 and that they should not exist simultaneously within a chart table. If you see more occurrences of this in other articles, that does not necessarily mean it is in accordance with policy. Remove it just like I do. Carbrera (talk) 01:57, 3 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Im not interested in reading sorry

Damn just because i capitalized the V in music video and the L in track listing you really blocked me from editing. How was that disruptive editing? It wasnt even that serious

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jordantrsonlychild (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How do you know I've been sockpuppeting? Another false accusation against me. I am not user: ronnieradkerockgod. If we share the same IP address that's because more than 1 person lives in my house. Please rethink this decision

Decline reason:

You're making the same sort of edits to the same types of pages. Too much for it to be a coincidence. 5 albert square (talk) 02:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.