User talk:Jordanotto

jordanotto is Jordan Posamentier. He is a licensed California attorney with a J.D., a Masters in education with a specialization in music, and a Bachelors in human ecology.

Image copyright problem with Image:Henry posamentier photo.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Henry posamentier photo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 04:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

fixed it awhile back. Jordan 04:31, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Chiropractic

Thanks for editing Chiropractic; it's helpful to have a fresh eye on the subject. However, I found some problems with that edit; can you please follow up at Talk:Chiropractic #Recent undiscussed changes to Effectiveness? It might also help to review the banners at the top of that talk page, e.g., "Please read this page and discuss substantial changes here before making them." (I don't want to seem off-putting, but alas the page is controversial so some care must be taken there.) Thanks. Eubulides (talk) 19:35, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on the talk page, "Most importantly, I prefer my ordering of the info to the previous version's ordering. I think the most important point under efficacy is something along the lines that...." was, I thought, a valid one. Do you have the time to flesh out a proposal for a specific wording change? I mention this because that part of the discussion has just now been archived, to Talk:Chiropractic/Archive 27 #Recent undiscussed changes to Effectiveness. If you'd like to further the discussion, I suggest starting a new thread at Talk:Chiropractic about it. Eubulides (talk) 16:45, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just now installed the change that you suggested, and which was further discussed in Talk:Chiropractic/Archive 28 #Fixing first paragraph under EFFICACY. Can you please check the result in Chiropractic to see whether it matches what you were proposing? Again, thanks for your contributions. Eubulides (talk) 08:54, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 20:19, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Jordanotto! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 298 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Henry W. Posamentier - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alfred S. Posamentier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercy College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paraphrasing

This is required as copy and pasting can be a copyright violation. Also please read WP:MEDRS regarding sourcing. Thanks. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 04:58, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Example for Arrow's theorem

The example was confusing, rather than helpful. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arrow%27s_impossibility_theorem&diff=630012808

To be able to say B beats A or B beats C, specify the preferences at lease, like 35 % prefer A to B to C (or A to C to B); 35 % prefer B to A to C (or B to C to A); 30% prefer C to A to B (or C to B to A). Some of these lead to the conclusion you wanted. However, in either case, it does not follow from the assumptions of the theorem that B will be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theorist2 (talk • contribs) 04:49, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Portfolio strategy

Hello Jordanotto,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Portfolio strategy for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:28, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Portfolio strategy article

Hello, thanks for writing this article! I’ve just read it and I’m a bit concerned that it has no citations. That worries me since without proof that this topic is notable, meaning covered enough in media to get a Wikipedia article on it, the article may get deleted.

Are there any reliable sources on the topic that you can add? If so just edit the article and add citations using the cite tool, or if you have any thoughts or questions just let me know. Blythwood (talk) 20:13, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jordanotto. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]