User talk:Jordannahe

Welcome!

Hello, Jordannahe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Makeshivt kity, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! BrianY (talk) 00:43, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Makeshivt kity

A tag has been placed on Makeshivt kity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. BrianY (talk) 00:43, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recreating non-notable articles

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:50, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's loser like Jamie that make it hard to enjoy anything like an OPEN ENCYCLODEDIA...to suggest that I am vandalizing a PUBLIC website shows how much of a tight wad he is.

I am makeshivt kity. I am trying to get my art out. My work is valid.

And Jamie should do some research or HELP GUIDE it's new users to create a corrtect article instead of INSULTING AND TURNING PEOPLE OFF FROM NEW AVENUES OF SHARING INFORMATION. LEAVE ME ALONE.

File permission problem with File:Jordannahhair.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jordannahhair.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 00:41, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, instead of writing it yourself. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 00:42, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spamming or advertising, and because of personally attacking another editor. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:51, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have chosen to yet again recreate essentially the same self-promotional article you have twice had deleted, this time under a different title, despite being warned about doing so. It is also clear that your only purpose in editing Wikipedia is self promotion: this is shown not only by your editing history, but also by your own assertion ("I am trying to get my art out"). Contrary to what your comment above suggests you think, "anyone can edit Wikipedia" does not mean "anyone can add any material they choose to Wikipedia, without any standards or restrictions". Wikipedia is not a medium for advertising or promotion, and using it as such is in itself sufficient ground for being blocked from editing Wikipedia. If there were any doubt as to whether to block you, your personal attack on another editor (OhNoitsJamie) would be enough to decide the question. Personal attacks are not acceptable. If you wish to be unblocked, you must indicate (1) that intend to work cooperatively with other editors, and (2) that you intend to edit on other subjects than promoting yourself. Under those circumstances you should be able to become a constructive contributor to Wikipedia, if you wish to. If, however, you have no interest in editing here other than advertising your own work, then Wikipedia is not the right place for you, and you should find other web sites to do so. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:51, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]