Jump to content

User talk:Jordan500

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Lyle123 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Erik (talkcontrib) - 00:07, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article New York Zoo (film), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with New York Zoo (film). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. —Erik (talkcontrib) - 13:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Behavior

[edit]

While I'd like to assume good faith of your intents, your new article matches the trend of previous articles that were determined to be hoaxes. None of them had any verifiable coverage about the purported films. Can I ask you why you would bother with such articles? It's a waste of time for you and me and everyone involved. We'd all be better off if you could re-focus your efforts into making verifiable contributions to Wikipedia. There's a lot of genuine articles that could be created or improved, and I ask you to reconsider your approach to Wikipedia. —Erik (talkcontrib) - 13:19, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of New York Zoo (film)

[edit]

An editor has nominated New York Zoo (film), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York Zoo (film) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]