User talk:Jopharocen

Welcome!

Hello, Jopharocen!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Canvassing

Please note that WP:Canvassing is inappropriate. While the definition of canvassing can be complicated, any attempts to seek help off-site with a dispute is generally canvassing so please do not do it. It does not help resolve disputes, instead it makes it more difficult since it can result in an influx of confusing and unhelpful comments which will be ignored in any assessment of consensus. Nil Einne (talk) 08:08, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP ANI, 4 Sep 2023

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Kaalakaa (talk) 08:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Captivated"

"Captivated the heart of millions" is whimsical wording and not academic. This belies your personal beliefs, which do not belong in a Wiki article. Your comments make it very clear you want the Muhammed article changed based on nothing but your personal beliefs/feelings. That is NOT going to happen. Jersey John (talk) 06:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You might think so, but that's not what I'm requesting. If you read the discussion, you will see that my only request is that the article get reverted to what it used to be before June. The article had no Islamic tendencies and was written from a secular perspective, but neutral, unlike the new article after Kaalakaa's campaign. He didn't improve the article but almost changed all of it.

Me saying "captivating the hearts of millions" is just to show the importance of the main character and not a request for the article to be written from the perspective of an admirer at all, and I already explained this in the talk page.

This statement will not affect my points anyway, you may ignore it Jopharocen (talk) 06:24, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]