User talk:Jonnylovesvegas

March 2012

Your recent editing history at Nadia Oh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. El0i (talk) 21:35, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nadia Oh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Stop removing content without providing a valid reason for such. Also, album covers and other fair-use images must not be used to illustrate artist infoboxes. Snap Snap 22:15, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nadia Oh, you may be blocked from editing. Snap Snap 22:50, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nadia Oh, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Snap Snap 17:43, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Your edits don't appear to be vandalism to me, but the image use still is unacceptable. That is a copyrighted image, and cannot be used to illustrate the appearance of a living person. If you restore that image to the article again, you will be blocked from editing.

Additionally, no editor is allowed to revert any article more than 3 times in 24 hours, and generally it's unacceptable to make the same revert twice. You haven't been properly warned, so I will not block for this at this time. I will block if you revert that article again.—Kww(talk) 23:49, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for ignoring warnings about copyrighted images and edit warring. Any admin can unblock when editor agrees to abide by WP:NFCC, not use copyrighted images to represent living people, and to cease edit warring.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 00:33, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]