User talk:Jonnyk1982

Welcome to wikipedia. So what do you guys think about Sura 9, for example 9:29? Arrow740 01:34, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"true Quranic Islam"

Jonnyk1982, regarding this edit:[1] Wikipedia is not the right place to determine what is or is not "true Quranic Islam," or to excommunicate your fellow editors. Sectarian strife makes Wikipedia a depressing place, degrading the editting experience and the encyclopedia alike. Please try to avoid this mode of dialog, and focus instead on how we might most neutrally approach the subjects we aim to describe for our readers. Thank you.Proabivouac 23:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

JK- The last thing we want is to be called a sect. We even refrain from calling ourselves Muslims but call ourslves submitters or use the term in the language we speak. Our motto is "YOU help us to better understand the Word of GOD" which im sure youll agree is unlike most other religious beleifs. The Islam article must include a section to those who follow the Quran Alone because we are part of this system which means submission to GOD Alone in context of the Quran. We cannot tolerate Mullahs defaming the Qurn yb their biased and mostly Biblical interpreations of the Quran. JonnyK

What is your interpretation of surah 9? I'm genuinely curious about this. Arrow740 02:58, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Easy please read the sura from the beginning and the following verse to understand that it is ENTIRELY IN SELF DEFENSE: [9:13] Would you not fight people who violated their treaties, tried to banish the messenger, AND THEY ARE THE ONES WHO STARTED THE WAR IN THE FIRST PLACE?... Also note this verse: [2:190] You may fight in the cause of GOD against those WHO ATTACK, BUT DO NOT AGGRESS. GOD does not love the aggressors. This prob only arises when one ignores the context of the Quran and quottes individual verses from here and there thus not understanding the Quran at all. user:jonnyk1982

I read it. 9:29, in context, seems to be referring to all Jews and Christians. Arrow740 03:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

JK- Man arrow, plz try to understand. There is no word "all(kulli in arabic)" there if you wanna be technical. It talks about THOSE Jews and christians who together with the pagans drove people out of their homes just coz they didnt wanna associate partners with GOD and they also attacked them. The general rule reg Jews and Christians in the Quran is: [2:62] Surely, those who believe, those who are Jewish, the Christians, and the converts; anyone who (1) believes in GOD, and (2) believes in the Last Day, and (3) leads a righteous life, will receive their recompense from their Lord. They have nothing to fear, nor will they grieve. [2:62] Surely, those who believe, those who are Jewish, the Christians, and the converts; anyone who (1) believes in GOD, and (2) believes in the Last Day, and (3) leads a righteous life, will receive their recompense from their Lord. They have nothing to fear, nor will they grieve. [60:8] GOD does not enjoin you from befriending those who do not fight you because of religion, and do not evict you from your homes. You may befriend them and be equitable towards them. GOD loves the equitable. [60:9] GOD enjoins you only from befriending those who fight you because of religion, evict you from your homes, and band together with others to banish you. You shall not befriend them. Those who befriend them are the transgressors.

This only shows you did not understand the Quran but just took individual verses out of context, doesnt it? JonnyK

Free minds

A tag has been placed on Free minds, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Free minds. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. NeilN 21:42, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Yuksel.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Yuksel.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Free minds article

Hello. I deleted the article because the article seemed to be about a group of people but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and more specifically our guidelines on organizations and companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --KFP (talk | contribs) 09:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yuksel.jpg

Greetings. I replied on my talk page. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 13:07, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Openquran

The article Openquran has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is the page for a single, specific electronic version of the Qu'ran. Most of the article has nothing to do with the project (it's about Arabic in general). No evidence of this particular product's notability is offered. I can't find any evidence online that this particular piece of software is notable (all references seem to be to downloads; and they don't even all seem to be to the same company's software).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:37, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Yuksel.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yuksel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:19, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]