Jump to content

User talk:Jonloneman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mykel hawke, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.specops.com/Cadre.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:11, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

[edit]

Your addition to Mykel hawke has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. BelovedFreak 16:36, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

[edit]

Hello, are you the same user as User:Mykel Hawke or connected in any way? Please read Wikipedia:Sock puppetry about using multiple accounts.--BelovedFreak 18:24, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:Mykel Hawke, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ~ Dwayne Flanders was here! talk 18:46, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Mykel hawke. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop adding copyrighted material. BelovedFreak 19:32, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 04:19, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Afghan care today requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Regancy42 (talk) 01:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In reference to "speedy deletion" flag: I'm new to wiki and trying to adhere to all rules and regulations. I thought I had addressed your areas of concern and am a bit confused about what I need to do to rectify the deletion issues. Can you clarify? A.C.T. is an organization dedicated to ensuring the human rights of the people of Afghanistan by assisting them in the rebuilding of their lives, their communities, and their country. The commitment of A.C.T. to work alongside the people of the Country in these efforts is very important for their welfare. How shall I clarify this importance within the guidelines you require? I am currently revamping the A.C.T. website as the webmaster. I am also an member of A.C.T. ~~JonLoneman~~

The article Mykel Hawke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has been deleted twice before under the name "Myke Hawke" (see deletion discussion), and there doesn't seem to be any quality improvement. Article has numerous issues.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jared Preston (talk) 14:17, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]