User talk:Jonaspv
Image:Brotha lynch hung rip.JPG listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Brotha lynch hung rip.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 21:05, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Bruno De Almeida.gif
[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:Bruno De Almeida.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:16, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Carlton Crew
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Carlton Crew requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Non-dropframe (talk) 06:53, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Australian Mafia
[edit]I have nominated Australian Mafia, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian Mafia. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mattinbgn\talk 08:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Australian Mafia
[edit]Hello, i just noticed you added this to the mafia page. I also noticed the Australian Mafia article is up for deletion. I insist you source this addition now with good and accurate references. If you do not I will remove it and add it to the talk page for sourcing and references. Feel free to come to my talk page with any questions. Thanks, Beam 02:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Don't forget to sign your posts with the four tildes: ~~~~ at the end of your statements on talk pages. Please add citations to the part you just added to the main Mafia article so it doesn't get removed. Again, if you have questions come to my talk page, and don't forget to sign! Beam 02:39, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
- I posted a message at WP:AWNB for others' views. I hope that we can find a consensus rather than edit warring. Also, I apologise for being rude in this edit summary.[1] Moondyne 03:13, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Ogalo.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Ogalo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 01:24, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of The Carlton Crew for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Carlton Crew until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.