User talk:Joloimpat

January 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Quezon City local elections, 2013 was changed by Joloimpat (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2013-01-28T21:18:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:18, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Hello, I'm Howard the Duck. Your recent edit to the page Makati local elections, 2010 appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –H T D 18:40, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Your addition to Jose Mari Velez has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -WayKurat (talk) 02:02, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mel Tiangco, you may be blocked from editing. -WayKurat (talk) 03:16, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ponciano Bernardo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages San Juan and Jorge Vargas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alfredo Versoza (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Filipino, Ilocano and Lucena

Adelina S. Rodriguez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pateros

Brigido R. Simon, Jr. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Laguna

Norberto S. Amoranto (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to National University

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:10, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

You have contributed a lot of copyright violations recently. I have deleted pages like Ismael A. Mathay, Jr., Alfredo Versoza and Brigido R. Simon, Jr. for this reason. You have been warned not to insert copyright violations before. Please check WP:COPYVIO and related pages if it isn't clear to you what is acceptable and what isn't. In general, information you take literally or with only minimal changes from websites, books, newspapers, ... is not allowed here. IF you continue to contribute copyright violations here, you will be blocked. Fram (talk) 09:21, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Navotas

Please Stop editing wrong info on Navotas, The newly elected city officials is scheduled to be seated on June 30, 2016. Even they are elected. the are called Councilor-elect. -ItagaMoSaBato (talk) 14:01, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Might as well on Valenzuela, Philippines. Don't act too fast.--— JL 09 ^talk_contribs 01:29, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of people beatified under Pope Benedict XVI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Castello, Nysa, Rio Negro and Westphalen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martyrs of the Spanish Civil War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jesuit Martyrs in Micronesia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Emilio Aguinaldo may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:13, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sergio Osmeña may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Navboxes

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:17, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Manuel Roxas may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Navboxes

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:23, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Elpidio Quirino may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Navboxes

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:30, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ramon Magsaysay may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Navboxes

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:42, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Carlos P. Garcia may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Navboxes

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Corazon Aquino may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Navboxes
{{Navboxes

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:26, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Joseph Estrada may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Navboxes

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:48, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maria Mercedes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Filipino Saints, Blesseds, and Servants of God may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Frans De Snick]]- (1886-1945), professed priest, Congregation of the Immaculate Heart of Mary (Missionhurst

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:14, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

522 Spanish Martyrs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Córdoba, Cartagena, Cuenca, Jaén and Ávila

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of people beatified by Pope John Paul II may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:36, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of political families in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Osmeña (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of people beatified by Pope John Paul II may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:37, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of saints canonized by Pope Francis may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Brochero|Jose Gabriel del Rosario Brochero]]||1840||1914||September 14, 2013||Villa Cura Brochero, [[Córdoba, [[Argentina]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:42, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of saints canonized by Pope Francis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cordoba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cebuano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of political families in the Philippines may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:34, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of political families in the Philippines may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:20, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of political families in the Philippines may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:51, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of political families in the Philippines may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

==Romulo Family ([[Quezon City]],[[Pasig]] and ([[Valenzuela]])==
** Roman Romulo - Congressman, Lone District of Pasig City (2010-present

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:43, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of political families in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valenzuela (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Martyrs of Guam and Mariana Islands

Hello Joloimpat,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Martyrs of Guam and Mariana Islands for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Stepojevac (talk) 16:16, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 5 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the 2014 in the Philippines page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Espiridiona Bonifacio

Hi, I'm Zekesonxx. Joloimpat, thanks for creating Espiridiona Bonifacio!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Choppily written.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Zeke Sonxx (Whine) 00:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Espiridiona Bonifacio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thirteen Martyrs of Bagumbayan

Hello Joloimpat,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Thirteen Martyrs of Bagumbayan for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Fylbecatulous talk 01:35, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for reverting your edit on Twenty-four Martyrs of Bagumbayan

Since you blanked the page you might want to consider asking it to be deleted? -- Kndimov (talk) 02:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated the page for deletion, pursuant of your blanking. -- Kndimov (talk) 02:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fifteen Martyrs of Bicol, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pateros and Bicol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PDAF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of people beatified under Pope Benedict XVI, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Westphalen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of political families in the Philippines may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:03, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please make sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Elizium23 (talk) 23:39, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Melissa Mendez may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| 2006 || [[Now and Forever (TV series)|Now And Forever: [[Dangal]] || Guest || [[GMA Network]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:10, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of saints canonized by Pope Francis, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 02:38, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 14 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the 2014 in the Philippines page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:45, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to List of people declared venerable by Pope Francis does not have an edit summary.Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Elizium23 (talk) 00:55, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of people declared venerable by Pope Francis. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 01:24, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to List of saints canonized by Pope Francis has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 05:38, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism#Interwiki links

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism#Interwiki links. Thanks. Elizium23 (talk) 00:55, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

One more disruptive edit without a hint of attempting to discuss it and I will drag you to WP:ANI for complaints about your tendentious and uncollegial editing habits. Elizium23 (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, Joloimpat, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 17:58, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at List of saints canonized by Pope Francis. Elizium23 (talk) 18:01, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 22:25, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Using talk pages

I would like to request that you not further engage in edit wars over articles. I notice that since you signed up with Wikipedia in 2012 you have been warned, cautioned, or otherwise asked to look at various policies, errors, or elements of Wikipedia. I can't see where you've honestly responded to anyone during this time and I also can't see where you're really taking most of this to heart. If someone is reverting your edits then it is likely that they have a reason why they wanted it a different way. At this point the correct response is to try to engage the other editor in discussion, not routinely revert their edits. Even if the other editor was doing something wrong (offhand it doesn't appear that they did), you need to have some sort of discussion about this in some format. I can't even see where you've given an edit summary explaining your reasons for reverting their edits. If you keep on like this, not responding directly to anyone, I'll be forced to gain your attention another way- by blocking you for a short period of time. I don't want to have to do this, so you really need to start responding to requests for comment, either at Talk:List of people declared venerable by Pope Francis, your user talk page, or at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Joloimpat. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:23, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do notice that you still aren't talking to anyone on the talk pages or on your user talk page. If I see that you are still edit warring over pages then I will be forced to give you a temporary block because that seems to be the only way to get your attention and get any sort of response. If by some chance you are not talking because you cannot understand English (as this has happened in the past) then I would highly recommend that you look into talking to someone on one of the various WikiProjects that would be likely to have someone that speaks your language. It may be that contributing to the English Wikipedia is not the best option, as you must be able to communicate with other editors at some point in time- especially if people are lodging complaints about you on ANI. I can't stress how serious this ultimately is- you must be willing to talk to people at some point on Wikipedia. I initially didn't want to talk to others on Wikipedia either, but it is necessary to create a stronger encyclopedia. Not talking to others is not an option on this website, not if you plan on staying here. I can't emphasize that enough. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:47, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jose Gabriel del Rosario Brochero

The article Jose Gabriel del Rosario Brochero has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Needs more verifiable content to assert notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. smileguy91^talk 02:41, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jose Gabriel del Rosario Brochero for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jose Gabriel del Rosario Brochero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jose Gabriel del Rosario Brochero until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. smileguy91^talk 02:45, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Jose Gabriel del Rosario Brochero. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:05, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Małgorzata Szewczyk, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Polish and Aleksandrów. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary block

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:50, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that I had to do this, but I see no other way of making sure that this gets your attention. The problem here is that you have a very, very long running issue of editing without discussing anything with anyone on the talk page or even really making a comment in the edit summary section. This wouldn't be so bad except that you do have a history of making controversial edits to the point where it was brought up at ANI. You've also removed the AfD notice on an article that you created, which will not stop the AfD process at all and is in fact seen as an act of vandalism. If you want to contest the deletion then the only way to do this is to go to the AfD nomination page (You can find it here) and show evidence as to how the person is notable. You've reached the point of editing where communication of some sort is absolutely necessary in order to continue editing smoothly and to work as a team. Remaining silent is not helping you here in the slightest. I'd like to avoid this turning into a longer block and I wish that I didn't have to block you at all, but I can't see any other way of getting your attention. That you've made some helpful edits in the past is one of the few things that you have going in your favor but even then that may fall by the wayside if you continue to insist on not discussing things with other editors in favor of edit warring and removing AfD templates. Please discuss edits rather than reverting other editors' actions as this can be seen as vandalism since you're not explaining the reason for your edits. Thing is, I shouldn't have to block you in order to gain your attention. If this becomes a habit I (or another admin) may be forced to block you permanently. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:50, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of people beatified under Pope Benedict XVI, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Limburg and Landes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of people declared venerable by Pope Paul VI, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Gerard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Makati local elections, 2016. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Makati local elections, 2016, you may be blocked from editing. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:48, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pampanga local elections, 2016

Please stop changing the introduction to read "Local elections was held in the Province of Pampanga on May 9, 2016". Thanks, Number 5 7 22:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Joloimpat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Joloimpat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Joloimpat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Philippines at the 2019 Southeast Asian Games, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ^{Babymissfortune} 16:05, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

I am not sure what you are aiming for on List of people beatified by Pope Francis. You are making quite nonsensical edits. The templates at the top do not get updated at every new month, the "date=November 2019" is when they were first applied. The date is for internal tracking purposes. Also, why are you adding blank 2020 structures? It is not 2020 yet. When the first person is beatified in 2020 then we can add a new table, it will not be any more difficult without the blank structure there, and less confusing. Thanks. Elizium23 (talk) 02:25, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Michepman (talk) 04:56, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. You know the drill. Elizium23 (talk) 04:58, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Joloimpat / 173.66.144.28. Guy Macon (talk) 04:30, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Elizium23 (talk) wishes you a Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! May this be a time of peace, joy and goodwill towards men.

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:Wikipedia:CONTRIB/Holidays/Christmas1}} to your friends' talk pages.

Elizium23 (talk) 15:30, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to login

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:17, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to List of people beatified by Pope Francis has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Elizium23 (talk) 01:34, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Martyrs of the Spanish Civil War has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Elizium23 (talk) 01:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to List of people beatified by Pope Francis has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Elizium23 (talk) 00:58, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ReaderofthePack: sigh... Elizium23 (talk) 01:07, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd bring this up again at ANI - I'm somewhat hesitant to take action on my own, this is the type of situation where community discussion would be best. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I know I'd blocked him in the past, but given how long this has been going on with different issues, ANI would be the better option. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:46, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No. It's not. I won't get anywhere. Everyone thinks it's copacetic. Elizium23 (talk) 15:48, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at List of people beatified by Pope John Paul II. Elizium23 (talk) 04:39, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at List of people beatified by Pope John Paul II. Elizium23 (talk) 15:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent, long-term unresponsive, disruptive editing against other users' concerns, edit warring, after a previous block and multiple WP:ANI discussions about the same issue.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:27, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2016 Santa Rosa local elections

The article 2016 Santa Rosa local elections has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article, no evidence of notability per WP:GNG or WP:NEVENT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mdann52 (talk) 19:12, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]