User talk:Jojopuppy

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Pastorwayne (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

You've been mentioned at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Hi Jojopuppy. Your edits are being discussed at WP:ANI#User:EstherLois. You are invited to respond there. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 00:29, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some direction here would help. I am new to this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jojopuppy (talk • contribs)

It's quite surprising to me that a user who says they are new to WP could manage to create a new category on their second edit—complete with appropriate parent categories and sorting! But if you'd like to appeal, read Wikipedia:Appealing a block. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 00:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Antigua and Barbuda Seventh-day Adventists

I have nominated Category:Antigua and Barbuda Seventh-day Adventists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Kittybrewster ☎ 06:04, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Grenadian Roman Catholic priests

A tag has been placed on Category:Grenadian Roman Catholic priests requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:47, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Grenadian priests

A tag has been placed on Category:Grenadian priests requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:28, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]