User talk:Jojojoe

Welcome!

Hello, Jojojoe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Chemicalize.org, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kevin (talk) 10:21, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Chemicalize.org"

A page you created, Chemicalize.org, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a website, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for websites in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Kevin (talk) 10:21, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Iconostasis of the Cathedral of Hajdúdorog

I think you did a really good job on the article. It is certaintly far better than just Start. I rated it C but it is in fact close to B. If you want to improve it further, I would suggest the following:

Make sure all items of factual information are backed by inline references. Don't hesitate to repeat the same references if necessary. Always make sure there is a reference at the end of each paragraph. A wikilink to another article is not sufficient for references purposes. You need to repeat pertinent references in this article.
The lead needs to be improved by including more of the most important information from the rest of the article. It could be at least twice as long as it is now. Inline references should not be included in the lead but in the relevant section of the body of the article.
The prose might require some attention.

By and large though, it is a very good, interesting and well written article. Let me know if you need any further help.--Ipigott (talk) 08:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've now copy-edited the article. Perhaps you can read it through to make sure I have not introduced any errors. All the best for Christmas and the New Year! I look forward to seeing more work along these lines next year.--Ipigott (talk) 12:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for expanding the lead and adding all the references. The article now looks much better. It has been pointed out that the article on Hajdúdorog is very weak in the English Wikipedia. As you seem to be one of the Hungarian article's main editors, perhaps you would like to help to expand the English article? It doesn't necessarily need to be as detailed as the Hungarian article.--Ipigott (talk) 08:02, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Then we can look forward to improvements in the not too distant future. I see you have created almost 600 articles in Hungarian. Quite an achievement. It would be great if you could help to improve the coverage of Hungary on the EN Wiki. There aren't many of us who speak Hungarian and Google translate can only give a very approximate idea of what the article's are about. Once again, all the best for Christmas.--Ipigott (talk) 11:18, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Jojojoe. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Jojojoe~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

00:56, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chemicalize

The article Chemicalize has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A copy of Draft:Chemicalize that has been declined due to a lack of reliable and independent sources to allow this topic to pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nicnote^{say hello!}_contribs 14:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]