User talk:Johnymin
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Johnymin! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
{{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. |
---|
|
|
Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 15:34, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
June 2024
[edit]Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Whig Party (United States), please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 15:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Federalist Party
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Federalist Party, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:03, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Republican Governance Group
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Republican Governance Group, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
November 2024
[edit]Your recent editing history at Centre-right politics shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Woodroar (talk) 05:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- But the coalition of Venezuela is not centre right. Its not true. And not all centre righ opposed lgbt rights, only a part, i di minor changes Johnymin (talk) 05:25, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- did* Johnymin (talk) 05:25, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Centre right* Johnymin (talk) 05:26, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- I have no opinion on the dispute and I really don't care. You can be completely correct but still get blocked for edit warring. I suggest reading through the links above, leaving the article alone, and trying to work on a consensus on the article's Talk page. Woodroar (talk) 06:02, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Centre right* Johnymin (talk) 05:26, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- did* Johnymin (talk) 05:25, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Centre-right politics. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- If You search acción democrática and voluntad popular You will understand why the antichavista coalition of 2015 is not centre right Johnymin (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- And they only won a legislative election. Maduro annulled it. Johnymin (talk) 20:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Also Un Nuevo Tiempo and la causa radical are centre left. Also Movimiento por Venezuela. A lot of Center left members, and there's no source to prove that the coalition in Venezuela is Center right. Johnymin (talk) 21:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- And they only won a legislative election. Maduro annulled it. Johnymin (talk) 20:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)