User talk:Johnwiki2008

Imonggo deletions

Hi. When I performed the most recent deletion I did look to see whether or not it was the same as the version that was previously deleted. I haven't got time to look again, but from memory I took it to be insufficiently different to the previous version such that it met the criteria of WP:CSD#G4 (recreation of a deleted article) and also therefore met the WP:CSD#G11 criteria for being unnavigable promotional.

As I say, I don't have time to look again now (and probably wont do until the weekend), so if you still disagree with my interpretation then I recommend listing it at Wikipedia:Deletion review where other users will take a look. Thryduulf (talk) 10:34, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've misunderstood my comment about time. When I performed the deletion I did have time to review it properly. What I don't have time for is to review it again now. Rather than create an "investigation log" the correct way to discuss deletions that you do not feel appropriate is to ask for a review at Wikipedia:Deletion review where lots of uninvolved users (administrators and normal users) will take a look at it and consensus will emerge as to whether the deletion was correct or not. Thryduulf (talk) 11:29, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Further to the above message, I've listed it at deletion review myself. See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 November 13#Imonggo POS Software where any future comments will be best directed. Thryduulf (talk) 11:45, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- Please direct your future comments to the deletion review discussion rather than my talk page so that they can be kept in context and uninvolved users are aware of them and can investigate as well as me. I still do not have the time I need (much more than one minute) to ensure than any comparison I make (not just of the cached version but deleted revisions, etc) are correct. Thryduulf (talk) 21:04, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did some touch-up, but what the article really needs most is another reference to a 3rd party review. If you can What would help meanwhile is if you condensed very sharply the list of features to a few key ones and put in in paragraph format. DGG ( talk ) 03:26, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank DGG so much for the insightful advice! I really appreciate your valuable time on this! I think I will rewrite the page. Happy Thanksgiving! ---JohnWiҚi²⁰⁰⁸ 20:13, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]