User talk:Johnny Rockfort

Welcome!

Hello, Johnny Rockfort, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Sarcasticidealist (talk) 17:32, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Aberdeen, Washington has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 12:10, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Date linking

Just a note to tell you that wikilinking of dates has been deprecated per WP:MOSNUM and repetitive linking of terms/persons/pages is discouraged. Please keep this in mind before you link birth and death dates that have already been unlinked. Thanks! Wildhartlivie (talk) 12:15, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Seattle constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thank you. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 19:07, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seattle

Johnny: Thanks for your contribution. However, while lists may allow for faster scanning, Wikipedia articles prefer prose as it is more encyclopaedic and allows for greater development of the subject. Cheers. --Ckatz^chat _spy 19:18, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Aberdeen. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kevin Forsyth (talk) 19:48, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Franklyn

Hey, I think "Premise" is the best way to title the section heading right now since we don't have a comprehensive section about the film's plot. The definition of premise is a basic introduction of what the film will be about, so I think that this suits the content for now. When the film experiences a commercial release, we can write in a fuller section and re-title it "Plot". —Erik (talk • contrib) 21:23, 3 November 2008 (UTC) The word "British" should be uppercase; if you look on Google News, this is how it is used. —Erik (talk • contrib) 13:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obama

Please don't vandalize the Obama article. You will get blocked otherwise. --Apoc2400 (talk) 15:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Barack Obama has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Wikieditor06 (talk) 15:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Barack Obama, you will be blocked from editing. Grsz ¹¹ ^→Review! 15:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Barack Obama, you will be blocked from editing. Everyme 15:17, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for disruption of the Obama article. Raul654 (talk) 15:27, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't going to block you, but you breached WP:3RR there by inserting content repeatedly against consensus. -- lucasbfr ^talk 15:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/AlexLevyOne(5th). Thank you. JohnInDC (talk) 15:12, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]