User talk:Johnny Cocks
October 2014
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bangkok. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 13:08, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:NeilN. NeilN talk to me 13:10, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. GB fan 13:21, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
UNBLOCK REQUEST
[edit]
Johnny Cocks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am very sorry for the edits which I have made on Wikipedia. I thought it was funny at first. After being blocked, I realized what I was doing was completely wrong. Vandalizing Wikipedia was meant to be a joke, which I have realized has caused lots of damage. I promise to never vandalize Wikipedia ever again. Please unblock me. I want to become a constructive editor. Sorry for my actions to Wikipedia. If this unblock request fails can I create another account to make constructive edits? Johnny Cocks (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
17 minutes between vandalism and repentance! No, vandals are not welcome, and you may not create another account. --jpgordon::==( o ) 14:57, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Johnny Cocks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
OK, it has been two days now. I want to apologize to the Wikipedia Community (please post this somewhere prominent) for the bad edits and vandalism which I have made. My edits were funny at first (I was with some friends in an internet cafe and I wanted to impress them). I want to be an honest person, and not evade my block. I have read the Guide to Appealing Blocks. I really want to make constructive edits to Wikipedia, such as fixing grammar and also adding useful information to current events but I cannot because of this block. Once again, I am very sorry for my actions to Wikipedia. Another thing: This time if my unblock request fails, can I create a new account? I really want to turn around and become a constructive editor. Johnny Cocks (talk) 13:54, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
A combination of behavioral evidence, and checkuser information indicates that you are almost certainly a sock puppet of another user. In this context, you should log into your main account, and request an unblock using that account. PhilKnight (talk) 14:49, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Note to reviewing admin: this is the same person as User:Jimbo Suck Cock and User:San Roberta (check the filter log for the latter). --jpgordon::==( o ) 14:11, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks Jpgordon. After checkusering this account, I've noticed the similarity between this edit by Johnny Cocks (talk · contribs), and this edit by Adrian Clemens (talk · contribs). Based on behavioral evidence, and checkuser information, it seems they are the same user. Anyway, given this account is almost certainly a sock, I've modified my decline reason. PhilKnight (talk) 14:49, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Johnny Cocks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why are User:Jpgordon and User:PhilKnight such incompetent admins? They should be BLOCKED from Wikipedia, not me. By the way I am NOT San Roberta! Stop being biased idiots! Isn't it easier if you do your job properly? I am sick and tired of you two saying I am a sockpuppet. Just unblock me! Johnny Cocks (talk) 1:30 pm, Today (UTC+1)
Decline reason:
Not going to happen. I think we've heard quite enough from you now, thanks, so bid farewell to your talkpage access. Yunshui 雲水 12:38, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Just unblock me.
- Using swear words, discussing other people's conduct and not your own, and personal attacks are sure fire ways to remain blocked. Please review these examples of poor unblock requests and address the concerns raised above before continuing; continually making unblock requests could result in your being blocked from editing this page. 331dot (talk) 12:34, 22 October 2014 (UTC)