User talk:JohnnyDeppig

Hey plz search information on whether or not Atom Willard is leaving the Offspring!!

Cool

Please stop making unverifiable edits to the article Cool. --CSTAR 20:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Jettison (Steady Ground album)

A tag has been placed on Jettison (Steady Ground album), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Andante1980 12:22, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to When I'm with You

Your recent edit to When I'm with You (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 11:41, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Pass Me By

A tag has been placed on Pass Me By, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

The article isn't needed at all, and it is poorly written.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Najoj 15:03, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Green Day

I'm puzzled by the edit you're trying to make to Green Day. If there's no confirmed information available about this album yet, we should wait until we get some information from reliable sources before adding it to the article. -FisherQueen (Talk) 18:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since there's no information to add, please stop adding this noninformation to Green Day. You can come back and add when there's verifiable information about this album. -FisherQueen (Talk) 19:03, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Green Day

I thought you were going to wait until there was verifiable information before adding it to this article? See yesterday's notes. -FisherQueen (Talk) 19:01, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, this is not cute any more. If you are certain that this information should be added to Wikipedia, discuss it on the talk page. And bring your reliable sources. -FisherQueen (Talk) 19:05, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to add unsourced or original content, as you did to Green Day, is considered vandalism and may result in a block. -FisherQueen (Talk) 19:07, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Green Day, you will be blocked from editing. -FisherQueen (Talk) 19:08, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Bleed It Out

A tag has been placed on Bleed It Out, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 17:24, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3 Doors Down's 4th studio album

3 Doors Down's 4th studio album has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this information might be inappropriate for Wikipedia because it is about something which has not happened yet. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so, citing sources.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 16:42, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

shh

You have posted a number of articles consisting of little more than song lyrics, such as I Just Can't Contain Myself. Please note that song lyrics are copyright and cannot be posted here. Also WE DO NOT WRITE ALL IN CAPITALS - it is shouting. -- RHaworth 09:34, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Number one modern rock hits of 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Number one modern rock hits of 2007. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - eo 15:16, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hay whoever wrote this should better look in his calendar before calling my contributions vandalism!! Please tell me why there can be a chart for the 27th of October even when there's more than a week to go?! Today is October 23rd and no one could tell me why they cite the October 27th chart for over a week now! So why should I stop CORRECTING WRONG INFORMATION?

Notability of Rick Stitch

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Rick Stitch, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Rick Stitch seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Rick Stitch, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:31, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]