User talk:Johnhorowitz733

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Johnhorowitz733 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, my account was unfortunately recently banned. I believe this ban was an accident or made in error.

It stated that I have another account (Juanafavour), but I do not control or use any other account. This is my first and only account, and I enjoy editing Wikipedia pages and contributing to the community. I have a focus on creating pages for women in STEM, as I have found a vast under-representation for women who have accomplishments in science, technology, engineering, and math and would like to change this. I am very saddened with this block, and if I had a bad contribution that caused this, I promise to further practice and learn Wikipedia policies to ensure of better contributions in future. I am not connected to any subject and I am not paid to edit any page.

Decline reason:

The contributions appear to be undisclosed paid editing. In addition, the account's user page claiming "Present activities: FAC reviewing" etc. is not only clearly wrong, it has been copied from the page of an FA writer. SarahSV ^(talk) 19:04, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Michael Coudrey moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Michael Coudrey, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Newslinger talk 08:59, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Michael Coudrey

Hello, Johnhorowitz733. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Michael Coudrey".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 10:15, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]