User talk:Johnhancock786

March 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Eupithecia disformata has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Eupithecia disformata was changed by Johnhancock786 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.905004 on 2016-03-04T09:08:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:08, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Armenian cemetery in Julfa has been reverted.
Your edit here to Armenian cemetery in Julfa was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sOnqjkJTMaA) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:17, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

White Genocide

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to White Genocide, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rockypedia (talk) 18:15, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at White Genocide. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Dcirovic (talk) 18:24, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at White Genocide, you may be blocked from editing. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at White Genocide. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:41, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]