User talk:Johnedlinger

Recent edit to Shrek!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Shrek!, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:46, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shrek (franchise), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Carniolus (talk) 12:17, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Johnedlinger, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. --Animalparty! (talk) 07:56, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of films broadcast on ABC For Kids

The article List of films broadcast on ABC For Kids has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a directory or program guide, nor a repository for indiscriminate information

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Animalparty! (talk) 07:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Do not create, add, maintain, insert, or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. Usually, hoaxes will be caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:28, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Toontastic The Movie: Video Game

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Toontastic The Movie: Video Game, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:33, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Piglet's Big Movie. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diffs: [1] The entirety of your analysis must be sourced. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Shrek (franchise). Carniolus (talk) 08:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Grinch (video game). -Thibbs (talk) 14:15, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Many Game Adventures Of Winnie The Pooh

The article The Many Game Adventures Of Winnie The Pooh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This title appears to be a hoax.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -Thibbs (talk) 14:29, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Many Game Adventures Of Winnie The Pooh

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Many Game Adventures Of Winnie The Pooh, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 23:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Piglet's Big Movie. -Thibbs (talk) 11:19, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do not create, add, maintain, insert, or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, such as you did with the article The Many Game Adventures Of Winnie The Pooh. Usually, hoaxes will be caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 15:57, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 16:02, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:07, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Valiant (film). -Thibbs (talk) 16:53, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you introduce jokes into articles again, as you did at Trolls (film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -Thibbs (talk) 23:18, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You know the deal. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:51, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]