User talk:Johndoe10001

Nabeel Qureshi

The two external links which you keep installing in the article are both a violation of WP:ELBLP. Please read the guidelines before proceeding. As neither of those links a 1.) neutral sources 2.) are not about the subject of the article, rather they are about his death. Inter&anthro (talk) 14:31, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding WP:EL violation. The thread is Johndoe10001 and WP:EL violations on Nabeel Qureshi (author). Inter&anthro (talk) 23:39, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Black Stone, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:12, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning on systemic addition of spamlink.

I have reverted several of your edits. They are all similar; addition of spamlinks which has been going for years. The ones you must frequently add or revert to are www.bismikaallahuma.org and menj.net. The later of course, belongs to Menj (talk · contribs) who have extremely similar behavior with you. Adding same links and reverting when removed in similar fashion. Please take a moment and stop, if continue adding such links, I will report your actions at WP:ANI. –Ammarpad (talk) 04:54, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Menj, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

–Ammarpad (talk) 18:20, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]