User talk:Johncosgrave

Welcome!

Hello, Johncosgrave, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask your question on this page and place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 21:57, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to William Joseph Cosens Lancaster, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:23, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What this means is, we can't analyze or compare the works of Lancaster with G. A. Henty unless they have been explicitly analyzed or compared by secondary sources. Wikipedia is not a place to publish novel ideas or interpretations, it is a summary of existing established knowledge, presented in proportion to its prominence in the published record. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:29, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you for the detail - yes, I accept that what you say is correct. I will remove it.Johncosgrave (talk) 15:26, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Johncosgrave, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Works by Harry Collingwood have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:22, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no copyright material whatsoever on the page - everything is either in my own words or is an attributed quotation from a public domain source, and all are well over 100 years old in any case. Which items are you concerned about? Johncosgrave (talk) 15:24, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the one who sent the above message, but the removed text appears identical, or nearly so (see close paraphrasing), to text which may be copyrighted. The summary you added appears to stem from user Nick Hodson's summary at Archive.org (or maybe originally to Project Gutenberg). Hodson's summary appears to have been repeated without attribution on other republishing websites (e.g. [1]). Although the copyright of Collingwood's original novel has expired, any subsequent annotations, introductions, or other derivative works can be copyrighted independently, and should assumed to be unfree unless explicitly stated otherwise (lack of a copyright notice anywhere for modern text does not imply a work is public domain). The license notice accompanying Hodson's upload to Internet Archive only allows for non-commercial, non-derivative usage, which is inconsistent with reuse on Wikipedia (see Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources). --Animalparty! (talk) 22:42, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was probably paraphrased from my ePub description - which may have come from anywhere originally. I did it at the end of the day. I am working through the descriptions slowly to use more contemporary reviews and remove my own opinions. Johncosgrave (talk)

Nomination of Horace William Petherick for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horace William Petherick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horace William Petherick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 02:15, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Members of Royal Institute of Oil Painters

A tag has been placed on Category:Members of Royal Institute of Oil Painters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:24, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete this page, it was was not empty but empties when the category links were removed from individual articles and changes to Category:Members of the Royal Institute of Oil Painters Johncosgrave (talk) 14:10, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Osborne Collection of Early Children's Books a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Barkeep49 (talk) 14:47, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I keep forgetting about the Move option- It was only after posting the article that I remembered about the MOS advice on definite articles on page titlesJohncosgrave (talk) 15:30, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give The Osborne Collection of Early Children's Books a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Osborne Collection of Early Children's Books. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Johncosgrave Johncosgrave (talk) 15:37, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Osborne Collection of Early Children's Books, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen Mary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:43, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gordon Browne, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hans Andersen, William Lancaster and Harry Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that thisis now sortedJohncosgrave (talk) 21:11, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Mills Sheldon (soldier) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Charles Mills Sheldon (soldier), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 01:35, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chums (paper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Leighton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:45, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Mills Sheldon (soldier) (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

doesnot meat the standard at WP:MIL for military personnel

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charles Mills Sheldon (soldier) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Charles Mills Sheldon (soldier), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 10:25, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johncosgrave! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 10:25, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your sandbox

Please note that per WP:USERNOCAT, user sandbox pages are not allowed to be filed in mainspace categories. You may include categories in disabled form, such as with a leading colon before the word category or wrapped in "nowiki" tags so that they are functioning strictly as text rather than as category declarations, but you absolutely must not simply include them so that the page files in the category as if it were already a completed article. I'm mentioning this to you because I see that User:Johncosgrave/sandbox has needed other editors to come in and disable or remove the categories eight times in just two months — so I need to be clear: as long as the page is in sandbox, your choices are "disabled categories" or "no category declarations at all". Please note as well that you can potentially receive a temporary or permanent block from editing Wikipedia, on grounds of disruptive editing, if you disregard this and continue to leave your sandbox page filed in articlespace categories. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 22:19, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Members of the Society of British Artists

A tag has been placed on Category:Members of the Society of British Artists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:26, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please delete this. It was replaced by the Category:Members of the Royal Society of British Artists reflecting the current name of the society.Johncosgrave (talk) 11:27, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Johann Schönberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plevna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:19, 3 May 2020 (UTC) Edited to disabmiguateJohncosgrave (talk) 14:08, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alice Corkran

Hello, I have commented out some text which you added to Alice Corkran in this edit, under "Later life and death".

The text is:

"Exhibition Road, South Kensington, London. Her leg was badly injured and she suffered from shock, and recovered only slowly."

If you can complete the sentence, please do - otherwise, it needs to be removed. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 23:18, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for your badly needed edits - and for spotting the orphan. I really need a better way of editing articles as in-line citations often lead to missing the wood for the trees. Thanks againJohncosgrave (talk) 15:48, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul Hardy (illustrator), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chelsea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Darley. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
- Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references

Thank you. Julietdeltalima (talk) 22:08, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was preparing a page on Francesca Maria Steele at the time. It is up now, so I have restored the disambiguation element. Thanks. Johncosgrave (talk) 11:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Illustrators of work by G. A. Henty has been nominated for deletion

Category:Illustrators of work by G. A. Henty has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fuddle (talk) 19:22, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stanley L. Wood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Kegan Paul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:39, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Kegan Paul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Elliot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hugh Thomson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clergy Support Trust, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Harry Collingwood

Hello, Johncosgrave. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Harry Collingwood".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:22, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Frank Feller

added links pointing to British, Blitz, Hackney and Hambledon

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

now disambiguated

Johncosgrave (talk) 14:58, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrew Chatto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Australian Imperial Force.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguated Johncosgrave (talk) 11:50, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Citation styles

Hello! Please don't change citation styles as per WP:CITEVAR. Thanks, Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 18:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed citation styles mostly on articles that I have created, converting them to LDR format because the resulting text is a lot less cluttered, and maintenance of citations is easier. I have done in also where I have been adding dozens of citations to stubs with less than a handful of citations. For future reference: what is the procedure for seeking consensus for such changes.Johncosgrave (talk) 09:53, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Pryce, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages JISC and Western Mail.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have disambiguated Western Mail to Western Mail

The bot had incorrectly identified Jisc as needing disambiguation. While JISC needs disambiguation Jisc does not. However, maybe the Jisc page should have a descriptor to the title.Johncosgrave (talk) 10:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My error. As well as the good links to Jisc there was a link to JISC in a footnote.Johncosgrave (talk) 11:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Flong, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Guardian and Lord Stanhope.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 21 August 2020 (UTC) Disambiguated Johncosgrave (talk) 10:00, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Lawson Wood

added a link pointing to Punch

Percy Bradshaw

added a link pointing to Hackney

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Both now disambiguated Johncosgrave (talk) 10:01, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Johncosgrave

Thank you for creating George Wright (artist).

User:Gazal world, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello. In my opinion, you should remove the addition details of Wright's family. Only mention their names, occupation, and other major details. No need to mention other biographical details of his children. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Gazal world}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Gazal world (talk) 17:49, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gazal world:Yes, you are probably right. It is not just this page but the pages for Gilbert Scott Wright, and Louise Wright (illustrator). I have moved the bio detail to footnotes, as some may be interested. Basically I was trying to achieve a balance between the three siblings I have written articles on and the other four siblings, two of whom were artists. Johncosgrave (talk) 18:14, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fred Pegram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page International Society.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Changing citation style

Hi, Please do not change the citation style of an article without prior discussion, as for example, you have done at William Rainey. Please see WP:CITEVAR. Hope that helps. 14GTR (talk) 17:54, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did not think it would be an issues as:

I originally created the page.
I am the only one to have added citations to the page.
I wanted to tidy up where there were references to different pages in the same source.

Johncosgrave (talk) 11:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Date ranges

Hi, I noticed that you had used {{snd}} between years on the page Robert Leighton. Please note that MOS:DATERANGE specifies that we use unspaced en-dashes for date ranges. I've changed that page, but you might want to check for similar edits that you might have made. – Fayenatic London 09:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip - Yes, this may cover quite a few of my edits. Is there any tool for automatically checking and correcting?Johncosgrave (talk) 11:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Possible typo in quote

Please see my note on the talk page here. Thanks. --LilHelpa (talk) 23:38, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Whyte-Melville, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Field.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 1 November 2020 (UTC) Now disambiguated. Thanks. Johncosgrave (talk) 08:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Need spelling check.

Hi, and thanks for your contributions to the project. I ran across Walter Ernest Webster today and wonder about the spelling of his father's name. Can you check it please? If it is shown correctly it should be marked with Template:Not a typo. Thanks --LilHelpa (talk) 20:13, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this. I have checked and his father's third given name is spelled Waithman on his baptismal cert. I have corrected the article.Johncosgrave (talk) 09:16, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dimsie Moves Up

Hi! The edit you made here has some poor grammar or typos in the quote which beg correction (proved→prove; make→made). Are they transcribed wrong or actually in the quote? --LilHelpa (talk) 13:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this. I have corrected proved to prove, but makes is makes.Johncosgrave (talk) 14:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gilbert Scott Wright

Could you take another look at your edits at Gilbert Scott Wright? I've corrected what appear to be typos in your edits. I hope (but haven't checked) that what I assume to be carelessness isn't repeated elsewhere. Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:04, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I obviously pasted in an infobox from another page I was working on and did not correct the dates. Thanks again.Johncosgrave (talk) 13:49, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Charles Mills Sheldon (soldier)

Hello, Johncosgrave. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Charles Mills Sheldon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Walkey

Please check the spelling on the source: St. James's Church. "Marriages solmenized in St James' in the Parish of Torpoint in the County of Cornwall in 1897". Thanks. --LilHelpa (talk) 18:37, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for this. I have now corrected the spelling of both solemnized and St. Jame's.Johncosgrave (talk) 12:30, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of style

Thanks for your attention to the R. Austin Freeman article. I'm not sure I read the manual of style section on capitalizing book titles the same way you do, so I've asked for additional input here. I'd welcome any comments might have as well. Best regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 17:11, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, the confusion over the "undo"s has been pointed out to me. Thanks again for your work on the article. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 17:55, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Three-volume novel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stanley Unwin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]