User talk:John from Idegon/Archive 76

This is an archive of past discussions about User:John from Idegon. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 70

←

Archive 74

→

Seasalter

Hi John,

first off, you put a number of edits on my talk page over a short period and I only noticed them now. So apols that I didn't respond to the earlier ones.

Is the edit to this Seasalter page not reasonable? Gregg Wallace is as much a "famous resident" as the other two mentioned - although I did broaden "resident" to include people who have their "home" rather than "holiday house" there. Is this issue purely the website used in the citation? If so, how about we broaden the definition & put in a reference to Wallace, but leave out any citation or external link? Would that work?

By the way, thanks for the gesture of good faith, I appreciate it and hope you'll respond in good faith.

If this is a "less is more" Vs. "more is more" thing then let me know. Also, I did notice that in the "list of people from..." lists, citations were more the exception than the rule.

Thanks,

Paul Dublin (talk) 16:07, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Paul Dublin, thanks for the reply. My entire problem is the repeated use of that source, a source for which I see no utility whatsoever. I really have no opinion at all on the inclusion of Wallace in the article. If there are sources in his bio tying him to the community, by all means add him. If you have a reliable source you can add to the settlement article to verify his residence, add it. There is no need for references that point to notability in a community or school notable people list, as having an article to link to is a requirement, and the existence of the article verifies notability. As an aside, the list qualifications you modified is a good change. At least on my side of the pond, having a holiday home in a community would not be enough for inclusion in a notables list. Under the guidelines for US settlement articles, a person has to have spent a significant amount of their life in a community. For resort places, maybe one's parents having a holiday home in the place would result in a significant amount of time spent in a place, but having one yourself, probably not. One's family may spend significant time there, but generally, the owner is only going to be there on weekends and or between major jobs. Thanks for your hard work. I spend a lot of time combating promotional use of Wikipedia, so your edit on Gary, Indiana jumped off the page at me (that's my birthplace), and I followed up by looking at your recent contributions. I seemed you had found that source and decided to use it, rather than maliciously using Wikipedia. Glad that is the case. Happy editing. John from Idegon (talk) 17:56, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

John from Idegon, thanks for clarifying. I have reinstated the edit but without a reference. I appreciate your guide. Good luck. Paul Dublin (talk) 20:28, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Eddie_Rosenstein#Request_for_discussion

The discussion requester came to the IRC help channel to seek further clarification on your revert and talk page reply. Your comment about seeking consensus certainly makes sense, but a newer editor may not fully understand how to proceed. Can you provide some clarification for them? They seem to be a newer editor, so letting them know what you mean by 'the appropriate template' and such would be appreciated. --JustBerry (talk) 15:26, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

JustBerry, I won't be doing that. He's not an editor, he's a paid user. Do not come on my talk page and denigrate all the good editors we have by comparing them to paid users. He is getting paid. He can figure it out himself. If you choose to help him that's your business. But you have no right to expect anyone else should. John from Idegon (talk) 15:44, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

following up

Hi, i would be happy to work together on Old Arkansas City High School and linked high school article, per your suggestion, after the AFD is closed. I think the AFD should be closed simply "Keep", at this point, to spike the bad idea of merging to the community college article. Although if anyone had noted the existence of separate high school article early on, it could have been considered whether to merge the NRHP info into it instead, and we can consider that, too. The high school article was created first, I think. --Doncram (talk) 15:36, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Effectively, the high school article as it exists now, will not exist. There are roughly 20 school articles that have to be completely redone that he made. School articles should follow the institution, not the building or the name. But in cases like this, where one historic structure that the institution occupied is NRHP, which is specific to the structure, but not the current structure, it makes more sense to give the detailed coverage of the historic structure in an NRHP article and reference back to it in the school's article. The subsequent uses of the historic building is off-topic to the school, but not to the old structure. Anyway, looking forward to it, pending a close at AfD and ANI. John from Idegon (talk) 15:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Quicken Loans

Can you please tell me why you keep removing Ron Berman as co founder of Quicken Loans? You were given several sources including two other Wikipedia pages. The Business profile of Quicken Loans and Dan Gilbert’s Bio. Rjb609 (talk) 13:48, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Rjb609, I already answered your question on your talk page. John from Idegon (talk) 13:57, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Just A Hi

This Wikipedia stuff is all new to me. I just wrote my first article and hope to write more. After your fantastic help with the image question, I came over to your page. Wow! It was so interesting and I love your "Userboxes and stuff" section! So I actually read them all and saw, "This user is one of the 1000 most active Wikipedians." Hats off to you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SherryOcean (talk • contribs) 17:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, SherryOcean. I'm much prouder of the Dad one and the sobriety one. Please remember to sign your talk messages. I looked at your draft (you haven't actually written an article yet; you're working on one). I'm an AfC reviewer, but I didn't review it, as I would have had to reject it. If you want to discuss it, I'll be happy to do so. John from Idegon (talk) 06:26, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Why would you reject it? SherryOcean (talk) 13:25, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

No showing of notability, and somewhat WP:PROMO. I'm going to be pretty busy for the next several hours, so if I might suggest, please read WP:My first article, WP:GNG and WP:RS. Then perhaps you can explain to me why I'm right or wrong. The Socratic method is usually a solid way to learn. John from Idegon (talk) 16:27, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Saint Francis High School

Dear John from Idegon, I was looking at Saint Francis High Schools' page and noticed that their notable alumni section was removed. Would you be able to guide me through making a suitable notable alumni section for the school?

Fatcat2 (talk) 04:06, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Perhaps. How about a link to the article? There are numerous schools by that name in the world. Many editors have notes at the top of their talk pages. It is always helpful if you take a second and read them. Thanks, Fatcat2. John from Idegon (talk) 04:24, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Greetings

Per your recent concern, I would like to invite you to this discussion. --JustBerry (talk) 05:17, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

How totally kind of you. Please stop spamming my talk page. I know how to edit here thank you and am more than capable of finding discussions that interest me on my own. By the way, a diff is not the appropriate way to link to a talk page discussion. WT:WikiProject Editor Retention#Seeking Consensus: Coordinators is what you're looking for. John from Idegon (talk) 06:16, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Mark R. Isfeld Senior Secondary School

Hi John. Was wondering about your take (or any of your talk page watchers' takes) on Mark R. Isfeld Senior Secondary School#Current Faculty. Seems to me to be nothing more that a long list of names of most likely non-Wikipedia notable people which is problematic per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:LISTPEOPLE. I've seen school articles with lists of notable faculty, but not too many with lists of current faculty. Such infomation seems much more appropriate for the school's official website than a Wikipedia article. Anyway, I wanted some more opinions since removing all of that would basically be equivalent to removing most of the article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:10, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for taking a look at that John. I was just focused on the list, and missed the other things. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:13, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

I'm not shy about trimming bad articles radically. I like to add some good content to replace some, but Canadian schools are a little out of my wheelhouse. Pinging Meters, the go to guy for that. Think we've got another addition to your to do list! John from Idegon (talk) 02:17, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

I'll see what I can find for it. Meters (talk) 06:20, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Whenever you can, kind sir. John from Idegon (talk) 06:22, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Yup, that really needs some content about the actual school, rather than just the namesake and alumni, doesn't it? Meters (talk) 06:29, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Abdurrahim Mollazadeh

Regarding this. Are you calling a forum post on a message board(which you so eloquently filled out as a reference), another so-called reference from (barristermunim.wordpress.com) and lastly a passing mention from a website called 5pillarsuk.com something that "clearly has references making a BLP prod invalid"? Those are obviously not acceptable references, especially for a BLP article. Dave Dial (talk) 14:16, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)BLPProd is only allowed when there are no references that support any statements about the person in the article.The sources do not have to be reliable. It's a purposely low hurdle. You will have to request a speedy or take it to AFD if you think it warrants deletion. Meters (talk) 17:00, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Dave Dial, as Meters said it's a low hurdle. Even an external link or a link in the body of the article is considered enough to blow out a BLPPROD. Don't get me wrong, the article sucks. It just didn't qualify for a BLP prod. When patrolling, I usually run WP:REFILL on articles with bare references. Especially when the references are foreign. It just makes it easier to analyze them. John from Idegon (talk) 17:47, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Ok, thanks guys. I've been here a long time, but am pretty unfamiliar with this portion of the project. Dave Dial (talk) 18:37, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

/* Notable alumni */ added recent HOF inductees with Wikipedia pages

Please restore my edit additions of notable alumni of Central High School(Philadelphia)

These grads will soon be inducted into their high school Hall of Fame per my source:

^[1]

2601:152:4400:1284:10DD:CB27:30E7:71B8 (talk) 03:33, 8 June 2018 (UTC) lancer218 on 6/7/2018

References

^ https://centralhighalumni.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/AACHS_Fall_2017-_Journal.pdf

Unless or untl you provide a reliable published secondary source for their attendance, that won't be happening. This is an encyclopedia, not a part of the school's social media presence. If you can come up with appropriate sources, you are free to add them yourself. The above is not an appropriate source. By the way, if you have an account, use it. Editing on the same subject both signed in and signed out is considered disruptive. If you do not have an account, do not attach a "handle" to an IP address signature. The IP can be anyone, and you can be on any IP. John from Idegon (talk) 03:41, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

The Dayton Regional STEM School

Hi John. Like the #Mark R. Isfeld Senior Secondary School, The Dayton Regional STEM School seems filled with an unnecessary list or teacher and staff. I've seen sections on former principles in articles before, but typcially not a directory of teachers/staff. This time though a source is provided, so I'm not sure if that makes a difference. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:53, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Just another let's use Wikipedia as an extension of our webpage/marketing brochure/school fansite. I nuked the staff directory, but more is needed. John from Idegon (talk) 08:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look. — Marchjuly (talk) 11:27, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Brad Smith

I forgot to disambig. the link and compounded that by not previewing my edit. Thanks for pickking it up. Dalliance (talk) 12:03, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

DeSoto County High School

Hi, I noticed you reverted my edit to PROD DeSoto County High School with the note about WP:BEFORE. I haven't been able to find additional sources to add to the article. Unless you meant WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES then would a redirect to the city be more favorable? – TheGridExe (talk) 16:48, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

No. Schools only have to meet GNG, not NCORP, and there is a strong presumption of possibly difficult to access local sources. Despite frequent RfCs, the outcomes at AfD never change. Secondary schools are pretty much subject to the same standard as settlements. If it is proven to exist, it's notable. That being said, it needs considerable improvement, which eventually I will get to. If you doubt what I'm saying, take it to AfD. You'll discover quickly I'm correct. John from Idegon (talk) 18:18, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

I never said you were wrong. I'm only stating what do you do when the information present is a single sentence stating its address with maybe the information in the infobox added to the prose? Is it sufficient to be a permastub? – TheGridExe (talk) 19:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Stubs are allowed. As I said, there is considerably more that can easily be added, and with good sourcing. This article lacks an athletic section, which in Florida, can be made very complete just by visiting FHSAA.com. A perusal of the what links here tab may lead to more alumni, and sometimes even juicier stuff. Anyone with access to newspapers.com should be able to piece together at least some history. The already sourced statistics can be updated and a demographics section added. It isn't what is in the article that determines notability, it's what's out there on the subject. There is nothing served by redirecting the article, or by deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 20:22, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Ok, that makes more sense now. Thank you for the information and even some methods for sources. I appreciate it! – TheGridExe (talk) 18:26, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Fishy

Thanks, Meters and others. I've also reported him at AN. John from Idegon (talk) 23:42, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

I already had him at AIV but no action yet. ANI might get faster result. Meters (talk)23:44, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

And now a CU block as well, as user:BBN Chuck , who showed up again under his own account after nine years. Meters (talk) 18:46, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Very strange. The master was indeffed in 2009. How the heck did he manage to manage to edit again under his original account? Meters (talk) 18:50, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

The 2018 edits were to User talk:BBN Chuck. Talk page access had not yet been revoked. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 18:53, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Of course... brains leaking out of head onto keyboard... obviously time for a break. Thanks. Meters (talk) 18:58, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Sam Davis

Regarding Sam Davis: What kind of source would you like to see that would confirm his attendance at MBA? Maybe his attendance there is more legend than fact? I'd like to know either way.

http://montgomerybell.pastperfectonline.com/archive/61A788A8-B796-404B-B8DD-688888374687 BillVol (talk) 05:53, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

https://mbalibrary.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/the-honor-in-a-name-sam-davis-and-mba-registration/ (Another source of interest)BillVol (talk) 06:00, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

The first isn't a published source, nor is it terribly reliable. The second is a blog, and unless the author of the blog is a recognized Civil War authority, it wouldn't meet WP:RS either. You stated in your edit summary that he's the school's most famous grad, aren't there books written about him? John from Idegon (talk) 07:29, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Davis is listed as an alum of University of Nashville, from which MBA has its origins. https://tennesseeencyclopedia.net/entries/montgomery-bell-academy/ I guess the eds have decided to keep the two separate, including alums. At a glance, I didn't notice any crossover alums. There is at least one book on Davis, but I do not have it. By the way, the same Tennessee Encylopedia website confirms that Bill Wade is an MBA grad.BillVol (talk) 14:38, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Correction. Wade is confirmed as MBA alum by TN Sports HOF website: http://tshf.net/halloffame/wade-jr-william-james-bill/

(edit conflict) When you look to an encyclopedia, since it's a tertiary source, you need to look to its sources to assess reliability. I have no knowledge of the one you mentioned, but I've worked with two similar online publications. The Texas Handbook is spotty in reliability. On the other hand, The Encyclopedia of Chicago (maybe it's Chicagoland. It's been a while.) has never let me down. If we could keep the kiddies from adding WP:SCHOOLCRUFT stuff, MBA has a lot of potential to be GA and maybe even FA. There are not a lot of US schools that can be said about. John from Idegon (talk) 16:46, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Removed Edits

John from Idegon,

I have been trying to make some edits to the Greenwood, Indiana page that have been removed by you. I understand the length and style comments, and will work to remedy those issues. Could you explain to me the issue with using government websites as sources? Such as that for the City of Greenwood, or the website for the Indiana General Assembly? I am new to editing Wikipedia articles, and am trying to update the Greenwood page with information about the government representatives for the citizens there. I am an intern with the city, and am looking for some guidance on how to meet the standards. Hopefully you can help.

208.88.252.2 (talk) 15:18, 13 June 2018 (UTC)New to Wiki208.88.252.2 (talk) 15:18, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Please can you look at this

Hi John, hope things are well, please can you take a look at Oak Grove School (Ojai, California). I have already cleaned up the infobox and removed unsupported parameters etc. However, an editor who has stated in their edit description that they are an employee of the school (think this is COI) has made edits to the article, adding information stating in the edit description "...Aside from the opening paragraph, all the following paragraphs are new and based on factual information from reliable sources". But no sources have been added. If you could take a look I would really appreciate it, thank you Steven (Editor) (talk) 15:53, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Steven (Editor), I've stubbed the article and left a very blunt note on the talk page. FYI, neither age range or students/classroom are valid stats for US schools. If your rationalizing infoboxes you might as well remove them (even if the data is populated, because it will never be verifiable to an independent source). John from Idegon (talk) 01:31, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Steven (Editor), reping because I forget to sign. John from Idegon (talk) 01:32, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi John, thanks for this. Regarding the age_range parameter, I guess the grades parameter is the preference for US schools right? In terms of students/classroom, these parameters are not in the basic syntax and I didn't add these to this school. But there is enrolment, this is alright for US schools right? The few additional parameters I added were already there from the previous infobox. In the article itself, it had the text: "The student to faculty ratio is 8:1, with an average class size of 15. The school is accredited by the California Association of Independent Schools (CAIS) and the Western Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC.)." I removed this - ratio and average_class_size was already there from previous infobox with this information, and I added the accreditations parameter with these two accreditations. Were you referring to average_class_size when you said classroom? I can remove this if I come across it in US articles, please let me know, thank you Steven (Editor) (talk) 16:39, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Yes, average class size is exactly what I was talking about. And yes, grade range is what we use over here. Another note, independent school associations are affiliations over here. There is only one accreditation agency and that's AdvancED (there used to be three or four but they merged a few years ago). Interestingly, accreditation is not a requirement and only about 40% actually are. Accreditation is usually only looked at by the admissions committee at highly selective universities. Sometimes you'll see the various state departments of education listed as accreditation, but that's not correct either. They license schools; they do not accredidate them. License is not even a universal requirement; that varies by state. We try to limit demographic sourcing to NCES, but the fact is they are always a year or two behind, so the various state DOE's are also acceptable. Don't worry, I find the British system very confusing too. Thanks for all you do on school articles, Steven (Editor)! Your contributions are invaluable. John from Idegon (talk) 00:14, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi John, thanks for this and you're welcome. Thank you for helping me out on school article issues that I've come across now and then, I really appreciate it Steven (Editor) (talk) 16:44, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Really

Please get a life and stop undoing my changes. Over the years I have added many information on numerous martial art fighters in MMA, boxing, kickboxing, etc. I am making necessary edits to keep the information up to date. If you find anything false please undo my edit but I am posting verified information while citing my sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.192.207 (talk) 02:27, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

One, learn how to post on a talk page. Two, I will continue to revert your out of guidelines additions to school and settlement articles. Articles about schools and towns are not about MMA. The only purpose in adding that crap is to publicize MMA. The biography is linked. Post any updates to it. And while your at it, learn what a reliable source is. I'll be moving this to where it belongs. If you cannot post on a talk page properly, don't post on mine, ye who has so much experience.. John from Idegon (talk) 02:34, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

COI due to being a paid representative

Hi - Regarding the article: Oak_Grove_School_(Ojai,_California) - The entire copy that was written has been erased following my announcement that I work for the organization. Am I free to edit this article now and add content again? I'm really trying to understand this whole process and am being completely transparent about my role. Thanks, Warren Warren.ojai (talk) 16:53, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Warren.ojai, no you are not. You are restricted from ever editing the article, with the sole exception of reverting obvious VANDALISM. Instead, you need to make a request for edit at the article talk page exactly as outlined in WP:PAID. When you make those requests, they'll need to be formatted as follows: for new additions, "please add (at location x) the following: blah blah blah" Please include completely formatted sources. For changes to existing copy, "please change blah blah blah at location x to blah blah blah", again with completely formatted reliable independent sources. Any unsourced requests will be denied and closed immediately. Other requests will be debated by interested parties (which includes you or another representative of your organization, but cannot include multiple representatives of your organization) until a consensus is reached. The consensus is what will be added or changed in the article.

Clearly your organization has a gross misconception of what Wikipedia is. I'd suggest you rectify that prior to proceeding. Further, I find paid editing here to be, frankly a disgusting bastardization of what Wikipedia is. Please do not post in my talk page again. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 17:44, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. TM 11:45, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Anza Trail School

Hi John. Was wondering if you'd mind taking a look at this newly created article about an ES. I did some minor cleanup of the formtting, etc. and the image issues are being taken care of, but I am wondering if there's enough here to support a stand-alone article. WP:NSCHOOL and WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES seem to indicate that a redirect to Sahuarita Unified School District is warranted. You have much more experience with school articles, so I figured I get a second-opinion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:34, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Done A little background on the COI template please so if the redirect gets undone, I know what I'm doing? Thanks, Marchjuly! John from Idegon (talk) 23:46, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look. Should the school's name still be Wikilinked in the districts article? I just added the {{COI edit notice}} to the talk page as general information, not for any specific reason. I often add that and stuff like {{Find sources notice}} to article talk pages I create just for general info purposes. In this case, however, the account which created the article is only a few weeks old and has been primary working on FOX News related articles. Then, all of a sudden the account creates a new article about an obscure ES whose only mention to date has been by name in a list of six schools in the district's article. So, I assumed, perhaps incorrectly, that this might be a former student, or someone else connected to the school just trying to create a new article in good-faith. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:02, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

If it is a former student, or a current one, I usually stay away from COI unless they make it impossable. It's been said the most common point of entry to Wikipedia is by editing either your hometown or Alma mater's article. Generally, I hold off on COI except for school employees trying to spin the article or kid's who will not accept "no, sorry, this isn't your school's page on Wikipedia". John from Idegon (talk) 00:15, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

And yes, the brackets should be removed in the district article. John from Idegon (talk) 00:18, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

That approach seems quite reasonable to me. The template "COI edit notice" seems to me to be more for general information purposes and not the same as {{Connected contributor}} or {{COI}}, but I can see how it might be seen as something else; so, I'll remove it. The district article, however, seems to have a serious WP:C-P issue though that needs to be addressed. Again, this was probably content just added in good faith by an inexperienced editor. Maybe there's a way to rephrase all of that content, but it probably should be done once everything has been revdeleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:36, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

You might want to look at User talk:Nathanl01444#June 2018 since the editor is saying they work for the school district and was assigned to edit the district's Wikipedia article. Perhaps you can offer some suggestions specifically related to COI editing of school articles which might be more helpful than the general advice I tend to give. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:52, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Done - I left him a paid1 warning, and a rather terse note on who a Wikipedia article belongs to. I'm on the fence as to whether his claim is for real, or whether it's a kid thinking he's getting a leg up by making that claim. There is a Nathaniel in the district email directory. John from Idegon (talk) 06:00, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for taking another look at this John. The editor also seems to be intent on making the article correspond to the district's about page. Is there anything on that website which might be added to the article? Copying and pasting the entire page is obvious a no go, but I am just if there's anything in the history section which might be useable if summarized and sourced correctly. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:43, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello John from Idegon, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: . Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: , , , .
Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Chassell Township School

I've done what I can with it for now. I t should pass. I still can't believe that a school with a graduating class size that's barely into double digits manages to make it to the state final. There are only about 40 girls in the entire high school. Meters (talk) 05:35, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Yeah that's amazing. Since in Michigan a student is not eligible for varsity sports before freshman year, and a varsity team generally has 12 players, that means that just about every girl that could be on the team was. Yoopers in general are pretty amazing folks. Thanks so much for all your work on this and Smyrna. I created both as an adjunct to something else I was working on at the time, and just never got back to them. I've been buried completely IRL lately (got my son the day school got out for a long weekend and have had him since, among other things) and haven't had much time for Wiki, as you might have guessed by the fact that I didn't drag the causal agent of all this dramah to the dramah board. As an aside, I love the area where Chassel is. Most of Michigan's ghost towns ate in that immediate area. John from Idegon (talk) 05:48, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Small schools are very interesting. There's a school in the same intermediate School District as my local school that only graduates between 2-7 kids yearly. And they field an 8 man football team, in a co-op with another school only slightly bigger; but the two schools are over 100 road miles apart! John from Idegon (talk) 05:53, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

I don't usually put that much time into one random article, but if it's up for deletion sometimes it's worth it to save one. Meters (talk) 06:01, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Reverts for Non-Neutrality

Hi John,

I have been trying to make some edits to the Starkville, Mississippi page to include information about the public school district serving the area, the Starkville Oktibbeha Consolidated School District. However, you keep reverting my edits to an earlier version of the page because of "non-neutrality" or "whitewashing".

Could you please explain how listing information about a public school district is non-neutral? I have raised the issue in the article's Talk page and have seen no discussion. The current formatting of the section is repetitive and includes duplicative sources, and I have tagged it as such.

Until there is more discussion on this article. I will continue reverting it to a version that includes information on the Starkville Oktibbeha Consolidated School District.

Bearclaws13 (talk) 03:41, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

You've repeatedly removed sourced content about segregation and replaced it with unsourced content that does not mention it. You started a discussion (finally) after the last time I reverted you. No one has a "right" to change content in an article here. You can make a change, but if that change is reverted, you (not the editor reverting) is required to establish a CONSENSUS for their prefered version at the article's talk page. This has been explained to you previously. At minimum, your changes fail WP:V, as you've provided no sources. But the problem is your removal of the very well sourced content. If you do not understand how that is being percieved as whitewashing, I cannot help you. Your taking exceptionally well sourced, albeit negative information, and replacing it with unsourced information that totally ignores the documented negative past. That is clearly whitewashing in anyone's book, and clearly a violation of WP:NPOV. The only argument you've made on the article talk page is what we call an WP:ILIKEIT argument and carries no weight. Instead, please make arguments that are based in reliable sources and informed by Wikipedia policies and guidelines for both the inclusion of the new copy and the removal of the existing copy. Bearing in mind that changes require consensus and you do not have that, I'd suggest you discuss this to its conclusion prior to changing the article again. I'll be happy to respond, once you've made a valid argument. I know there are others that are also interested in this that will likely respond too. Please do not bring content discussion to my talk but keep it on the article's talk page. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 05:07, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Conflict of interest question

I wasn't sure who to ask, so please excuse me for this. This user, User talk:JWillam, has made only two edits total, and both of them were at Jean Williams. The user added unsourced original research edits that cannot be verified by sources, and I'm wondering if JWillam is indeed Jean Williams. I'm not experienced enough to do or say anything to JWillam, I was hoping someone with more experience could look into this. I apologize if this is not your area. Coryphantha Talk 00:39, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

We'll, it's not not my area of interest, but I try to stay away from BLP as much as I can. Basically because of the rampant POV editing in the area. Between fancruft, self promotion and political axe grinding, it's just not for me. But I hate Wikipedia being appropriated for personal gain too. Coryphantha, this is what I've done: I reverted the unsourced change, left the editor a level 1 unsourced warning, and enquired if they were the subject of the article. This is a suggestion for what you can do going forward: If they reply, no matter whether yea or nay, you can report them to UAA as a disruptive username (role account). The entire article appears rather promotional, so you could take it to either BLPN or COIN for further review. If they reply that indeed they are the subject of the article, they should be warned about autobiography, and also directed to OTRS so they can vet their claim. Hope that helps, but with this, I'm out. Got enough drama already in my regular wiki duties. Keep up the good work! John from Idegon (talk) 14:46, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

John from Idegon Thank you, I wasn't sure who wanted to handle this. I didn't know if it was time to take it to COIN or not, this is my first time with this experience but I'm learning. Thanks again. Coryphantha Talk 19:26, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Marin Catholic High School ‎

Sorry, don't know what guideline I was reading about graduation years and attendance dates. Definitely not WP:ALUMNI and i can't find it again. Thanks for the correction.

I knew there was something off about the talk page contributions (I couldn't find your supposed edits in the history) but I thought there was a page history db malfunction. It never occurred to me that the user had quoted your edit summaries but had manufactured your signatures for the talk page. Meters (talk) 20:13, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Probably hadn't looked recently. I removed that about a year ago. John from Idegon (talk) 20:36, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Beverly, Massachusetts

I am responding to this message, which was accompanied by the orange "i" vandalism symbol: "Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Beverly, Massachusetts. While objective prose about beliefs, organizations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you." I have never in my life vandalized anything and am horrified to find myself labelled a vandal with this venture into editing Wikipedia (my second time ever). I have a lot of experience with writing and editing and thought that by volunteering these services I could make a positive contribution to the Wikipedia community. My intent was not "soapboxing, advertising or promotion" when I added "vibrant downtown" and cited a source that I thought — I guess erroneously — would meet the Wikipedia requirements (a .gov web site). The page as it stands contains unsourced inaccuracies (for example, referring to the city first as a resort community), and I was acting in good faith. My interest was in 1) aligning the page with the reality I know firsthand — in listing neighborhoods it doesn't make sense to mention Beverly Farms and Prides Crossing but not the downtown and 2) aligning the paragraph with the linked Wikipedia page on the Beverly Farms neighborhood, which contains the unsourced text "Beverly Farms remains a vibrant (bold mine) community with changing demographics. Pockets of residential development and generally escalating real-estate values appear to have adjusted average residency to a wealthier population, much as in the past." Although this experience has made me so uncomfortable with Wikipedia that I will probably not attempt any more edits, I would at least like to understand why the use of the word "vibrant" is acceptable on the Beverly Farms page, but not on the main Beverly page? In this message I have attempted to adhere to the guidelines and I apologize in advance if I have failed. Thank you, Alpha grl (talk) 21:31, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Alpha grl

I'm at a loss as to why you would think the letter "i" indicated vandalism. Here, as most anywhere on the internet, "i" indicates "information". There are many reasons an edit can and should be reverted besides vandalism. In this case, you did identify part of the problem. "Vibrant" is a word that imparts no factual information and simply serves to make a subject sound better. See WP:PEACOCK. The majority of your change was sourced to websites connected to the city. An encyclopedia is tertiary. We have little to no interest in what the city says about itself. I suspect that considering the size of your edit that at least some of what you added was based on your personal knowledge, not paraphrased from the sources you listed. This is not allowed also. Every single thing added to the he encyclopedia must be paraphrased from reliable secondary sources. See WP:OR. As far as something being in another article, see WP:OSE. Wikipedia is close to 18 years old, and early on, people played kinda fast and loose with the rules. We don't do that anymore. Mistakes get fixed when they are noticed. Changes are patrolled, so new errors get caught much sooner than old errors. There are over 5.5 million articles on Wikipedia, and every one is written and maintained by volunteers. I hope this clarifies my revert of your edit.

I also hope this doesn't discourage you. Everyone was new here once, and Wikipedia is much more complicated than most people realize. But it's still fun. People are generally glad to help, but most want you to ask for help. We do get a lot of vandalism, and the biggest problem we face nowadays is people blatantly using Wikipedia for free advertising. I sincerely hope that is not you. I'll leave you some links on your talk page to help you understand how Wikipedia works. And I'll leave you a link to a great forum just for new editors like yourself. Learning here is basically hands on, trial and error. Just learn from your mistakes and ask questions. Sorry to have taken so long to reply, but I came down quite ill and was hospitalized for a time this week. Thanks for being a Fellow Wikipedian! John from Idegon (talk) 00:52, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

High school athletic leagues

Hi John, hope things are well. I'm still sorting out unsupported parameters for Infobox school and came across Big VIII League. I found another high school athletic league that was also using Infobox school. I don't think Infobox school is the right infobox to use. Would you say {{Infobox athletic conference}} is the right one to use or {{Infobox school athletics}}, or maybe there is another Infobox? Please let me know, thank you Steven (Editor) (talk) 16:58, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

{{Infobox athletic conference}}, I think. It's parameters seem more fitting for a university athletic conference, but I see no better. John from Idegon (talk) 20:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)