User talk:John Vandenberg/recall

new pages on Wikisource

Interesting. Thinking about it, 100 new pages might be a bit much.... (For what it's worth, at this time, I'm not in favor of your recall. I'm just commenting in general as to your recall provisions. There are probably a number of WikiGnomes who have 10000 quality edits but very few new pages.) — Arthur Rubin (talk) 18:17, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note that that criteria relates to edits on Wikisource rather than Wikipedia. No originality is required.

It is possible to create 500 new pages in one day on Wikisource. I will find a few examples of this.

John Vandenberg ^(chat) 23:55, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, please disregard. You may delete the section if you feel it appopriate. Others may be confused, I suppose.... — Arthur Rubin (talk) 06:02, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have added one example of creating 500 pages in a single working day. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 15:27, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

comment by Edward321

copied from Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Advisory Council on Project Development#Durova's carrots. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 05:39, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[...] the list of people that you will allow to speak against you is far too restricted as you are limiting it to 1) Editors currently or formerly associated with ArbCom 2) Editors willing to publically support you for a postion of authority 3) Editors willing dedicate a huge chunk of time to Wikisource. (If someone were to edit Wikisource exclusively at your standard editing rate [1] it would be 49 days before they met the 3rd condition.) Edward321 (talk) 15:04, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]