User talk:John Torn

Created !

Hello John Torn, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article Wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

John Torn, good luck, and have fun. --Dia^ (talk) 16:11, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

--Dia^ (talk) 16:11, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

John Torn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Very often at the Creative Commons, different people have access the Internet from one IP, when they need to perform the same task. I have only one account at Wikipedia (not multiple accounts). Other employees also have one account (which take part in this problem). I ask you unblock me, restore the my contribution. The alien was at war of edits with another person, in the relation copyright and license CC +. This can see at the article Секс (ru Wikipedia). This is their problems (not our). Thanks for attention! John Torn (talk) 23:29, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your flat denial of using multiple accounts is unconvincing when both the behavioral and technical evidence strongly suggest otherwise. Not really sure what the rest of your remarks are supposed to mean, but this is the English-language Wikipedia, what they do at some other website is not our concern. The idea that this as a case of multiple users working on the same "task" is not believable, but even if it were, it makes no difference as it is essentially the same thing. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:03, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

External links

Hallo, please read here before posting external links on Wikipedia. --Dia^ (talk) 09:43, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I know the rules of Wikipedia not worse, than you. It should be note: site of the CC - is not one of millions of other. Millions of permissions is created by the СС for millions of websites (including, the Wikimedia Foundation with all projects). Should all be grateful to that organization for its contribution to the development of the whole of the Internet.

In addition: This is not a link directory. It's the same situation, how to refer to DMOZ (here it is accepted). Please, take this into consideration! - John Torn (talk) 10:12, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pleased to read that you now Wikipedia "rules" no worse than me, but maybe you missed few points. Here they are: one should generally avoid:

Links mainly intended to promote a website,
Links to any search results pages, such as links to individual website searches, search engines, search aggregators, or RSS feeds.
Mirrors or forks of Wikipedia should not be linked.(6 of the 11 links shown are from Wikipedia sites)
Sites that are only indirectly related to the article's subject (all the other links that are not 4 of the 5 remaining links)

The link you posted has all this issues. Therefore should not be in the article. --Dia^ (talk) 16:26, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Who do you fight ..... You fight with the Creative Commons. All your arguments are zero, in the context of my argument. The CC - is not one of others, but is more important. It is the Greatest Emperor, which has POWER to take away own license in relation of anyone, figuratively speaking. In theory, if Wikimedia loses the license: the result is death automatically. In addition: see: search results (in the article: "Sex" at English Wikipedia): http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Special:Search/Sex - in relation of search (your words). Where is your personal page? It is games. Nobody intervenes since the topic is such a specific, people do not want to be linked with such. Such force majeure situation (you built) has a very bad property: is a big problem for a person who had the misfortune to be in this situation. As a historian, will give an example: What happened with Rudolf Hess after trip from Germany in the U.K., in May 41? Rightly... He was declared insane.. I'm on the verge of a similar situation, thanks to you. About such things is not say out loud, especially in the context of sex. See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ignore_all_rules : Common sense says: you must waive of the inappropriate instruction. John Torn (talk) 19:21, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Your answer ignored the 4 issues which Dia^ has mentioned above. Thus you are trying to insert an inappropriate link, wage an edit war against attempts to remove it, and claim that the removal constitute vandalism. From administrator side, this all looks like disruptive editing, which should stop. Materialscientist (talk) 12:27, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All have done what you said. I will restore. John Torn (talk) 04:06, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Topic is closed there, including. John Torn (talk) 04:11, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, John Torn. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection.
Message added 21:56, 1 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Feinoha  ^{Talk, My master} 21:56, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You've been reported for edit warring

Hello John Torn. Please see WP:AN3#User:John Torn reported by User:OneLittleMouse (Result: ). You may respond there if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 06:25, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]